99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739372)
21. Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
Klok FA; Mos IC; Nijkeuter M; Righini M; Perrier A; Le Gal G; Huisman MV
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Oct; 168(19):2131-6. PubMed ID: 18955643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Value of ischemia-modified albumin in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
Turedi S; Gunduz A; Mentese A; Karahan SC; Yilmaz SE; Eroglu O; Nuhoglu I; Turan I; Topbas M
Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):770-3. PubMed ID: 17870479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measurement of expired carbon dioxide, oxygen and volume in conjunction with pretest probability estimation as a method to diagnose and exclude pulmonary venous thromboembolism.
Kline JA; Hogg M
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2006 Jul; 26(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 16836693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. C-reactive protein and D-dimer with clinical probability score in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
Steeghs N; Goekoop RJ; Niessen RW; Jonkers GJ; Dik H; Huisman MV
Br J Haematol; 2005 Aug; 130(4):614-9. PubMed ID: 16098077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
Michiels JJ; Gadisseur A; van der Planken M; Schroyens W; De Maeseneer M; Hermsen JT; Trienekens PH; Hoogsteden H; Pattynama PM
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2006 Oct; 32(7):678-93. PubMed ID: 17024595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simple and accurate prediction of the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
Miniati M; Bottai M; Monti S; Salvadori M; Serasini L; Passera M
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2008 Aug; 178(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 18436792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Probability scores and diagnostic algorithms in pulmonary embolism: are they followed in clinical practice?
Sanjuán P; Rodríguez-Núñez N; Rábade C; Lama A; Ferreiro L; González-Barcala FJ; Alvarez-Dobaño JM; Toubes ME; Golpe A; Valdés L
Arch Bronconeumol; 2014 May; 50(5):172-8. PubMed ID: 24360086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of a soluble fibrin assay in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Ginsberg JS; Siragusa S; Douketis J; Johnston M; Moffat K; Donovan D; McGinnis J; Brill-Edwards P; Panju A; Patel A; Weitz JI
Thromb Haemost; 1996 Apr; 75(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 8743176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the Wells score with the simplified revised Geneva score for assessing pretest probability of pulmonary embolism.
Penaloza A; Melot C; Motte S
Thromb Res; 2011 Feb; 127(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 21094985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (the PERC rule) combined with low clinical probability in high prevalence population.
Penaloza A; Verschuren F; Dambrine S; Zech F; Thys F; Roy PM
Thromb Res; 2012 May; 129(5):e189-93. PubMed ID: 22424852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
Miniati M; Pistolesi M
Q J Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 45(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 11893965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of three clinical scoring methods in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism.
Okumuş G; Engin Unver R; Kiyan E; Tabak L; Işsever H; Arseven O
Tuberk Toraks; 2009; 57(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 19714507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [The traps of pulmonary embolism].
Morpurgo M
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1998 Nov; 47(9):633-6. PubMed ID: 9864559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prognostic value of the Geneva prediction rule in patients in whom pulmonary embolism is ruled out.
Bertoletti L; Le Gal G; Aujesky D; Roy PM; Sanchez O; Verschuren F; Bounameaux H; Perrier A; Righini M
J Intern Med; 2011 Apr; 269(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 21198991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score.
Wicki J; Perneger TV; Junod AF; Bounameaux H; Perrier A
Arch Intern Med; 2001 Jan; 161(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 11146703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of 3 clinical models for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism.
Miniati M; Bottai M; Monti S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2005 Mar; 84(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 15758840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical experience and pre-test probability scores in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
Iles S; Hodges AM; Darley JR; Frampton C; Epton M; Beckert LE; Town GI
QJM; 2003 Mar; 96(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 12615985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Further illumination of the test threshold approach in the care of emergency department patients with symptoms of pulmonary embolism.
Kline JA
Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Apr; 55(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 20122753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications.
Griner PF; Mayewski RJ; Mushlin AI; Greenland P
Ann Intern Med; 1981 Apr; 94(4 Pt 2):557-92. PubMed ID: 6452080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Junior staff experience with a decision aid for differential diagnosis of jaundice.
Malchow-Møller A
Ital J Gastroenterol; 1993 Jan; 25(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 8428020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
