205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739477)
1. Microbial selection of polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria in activated sludge wastewater treatment processes for enhanced biological phosphate removal.
Mino T
Biochemistry (Mosc); 2000 Mar; 65(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 10739477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent developments in the biochemistry and ecology of enhanced biological phosphorus removal.
Kortstee GJ; Appeldoorn KJ; Bonting CF; van Niel EW; van Veen HW
Biochemistry (Mosc); 2000 Mar; 65(3):332-40. PubMed ID: 10739476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting the microbial populations at full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) wastewater treatment plants in The Netherlands.
López-Vázquez CM; Hooijmans CM; Brdjanovic D; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2349-60. PubMed ID: 18272198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic/oxic/anoxic granular sludge process as an effective nutrient removal process utilizing denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms.
Kishida N; Kim J; Tsuneda S; Sudo R
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2303-10. PubMed ID: 16766009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbial community structures of activated sludges dominated with polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria and glycogen-accumulating bacteria.
Lee TJ; Kawaharasaki M; Matsumura M; Nakamura K
Environ Technol; 2002 Jul; 23(7):747-55. PubMed ID: 12164636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model-based analysis of anaerobic acetate uptake by a mixed culture of polyphosphate-accumulating and glycogen-accumulating organisms.
Zeng RJ; Yuan Z; Keller J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Aug; 83(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 12783485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endogenous processes during long-term starvation in activated sludge performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal.
Lopez C; Pons MN; Morgenroth E
Water Res; 2006 May; 40(8):1519-30. PubMed ID: 16631226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Competition between polyphosphate and glycogen accumulating organisms in enhanced biological phosphorus removal systems with acetate and propionate as carbon sources.
Oehmen A; Saunders AM; Vives MT; Yuan Z; Keller J
J Biotechnol; 2006 May; 123(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 16293332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Could polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) be glycogen-accumulating organisms (GAOs)?
Zhou Y; Pijuan M; Zeng RJ; Lu H; Yuan Z
Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2361-8. PubMed ID: 18222522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model-based evaluation of competition between polyphosphate- and glycogen-accumulating organisms.
Whang LM; Filipe CD; Park JK
Water Res; 2007 Mar; 41(6):1312-24. PubMed ID: 17275874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which are the polyphosphate accumulating organisms in full-scale activated sludge enhanced biological phosphate removal systems in Australia?
Beer M; Stratton HM; Griffiths PC; Seviour RJ
J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 100(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 16430499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular characterization of the microbial community structure in two activated sludge systems for the advanced treatment of domestic effluents.
Eschenhagen M; Schuppler M; Röske I
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(13):3224-32. PubMed ID: 14509710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification and comparison of aerobic and denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms.
Zeng RJ; Saunders AM; Yuan Z; Blackall LL; Keller J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Jul; 83(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 12768619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temperature effects on glycogen accumulating organisms.
Lopez-Vazquez CM; Hooijmans CM; Brdjanovic D; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(11):2852-64. PubMed ID: 19380157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In situ identification and characterization of the microbial community structure of full-scale enhanced biological phosphorous removal plants in Japan.
Wong MT; Mino T; Seviour RJ; Onuki M; Liu WT
Water Res; 2005 Aug; 39(13):2901-14. PubMed ID: 15993461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aerobic phosphorus release linked to acetate uptake in bio-P sludge: process modeling using oxygen uptake rate.
Guisasola A; Pijuan M; Baeza JA; Carrera J; Casas C; Lafuente J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Mar; 85(7):722-33. PubMed ID: 14991650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metabolic model for glycogen-accumulating organisms in anaerobic/aerobic activated sludge systems.
Zeng RJ; van Loosdrecht MC; Yuan Z; Keller J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Jan; 81(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 12432585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of pH change on the performance and microbial community of enhanced biological phosphate removal process.
Zhang T; Liu Y; Fang HH
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Oct; 92(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 15962340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Batch production of polyhydroxyalkanoate by low-polyphosphate-content activated sludge at varying pH.
Kasemsap C; Wantawin C
Bioresour Technol; 2007 Mar; 98(5):1020-7. PubMed ID: 16790345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
