BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739757)

  • 1. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.
    Douglas JA; Boehnke M; Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1287-97. PubMed ID: 10739757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.
    Douglas JA; Skol AD; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):487-95. PubMed ID: 11791214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1298-309. PubMed ID: 10731467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors II: marker-locus genotyping errors modeled with hypercomplex recombination fractions.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1107-18. PubMed ID: 10712221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian fine-scale mapping of disease loci, by hidden Markov models.
    Morris AP; Whittaker JC; Balding DJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):155-69. PubMed ID: 10835299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equivalence of single- and multilocus markers: power to detect linkage with composite markers derived from biallelic loci.
    Wilson AF; Sorant AJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1610-5. PubMed ID: 10762546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.
    Cordell HJ; Wedig GC; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1273-86. PubMed ID: 10729111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-resolution multipoint linkage-disequilibrium mapping in the context of a human genome sequence.
    Rannala B; Reeve JP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jul; 69(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11410841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.
    Liang KY; Huang CY; Beaty TH
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1631-41. PubMed ID: 10762548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multipoint linkage analysis of the pseudoautosomal regions, using affected sibling pairs.
    Dupuis J; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Aug; 67(2):462-75. PubMed ID: 10869236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of sib-pair IBD sharing and multipoint polymorphism information content by linear regression.
    Rijsdijk FV; Sham PC
    Behav Genet; 2002 May; 32(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 12141782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of genotyping errors on linkage map construction based on repeated chip analysis of two recombinant inbred line populations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
    Wang X; Wang J; Xia X; Xu X; Li L; Cao S; Hao Y; Zhang L
    BMC Plant Biol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):306. PubMed ID: 38644480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect that genotyping errors have on the robustness of common linkage-disequilibrium measures.
    Akey JM; Zhang K; Xiong M; Doris P; Jin L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1447-56. PubMed ID: 11359212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.
    Sham PC; Cherny SS; Purcell S; Hewitt JK
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1616-30. PubMed ID: 10762547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of genotyping error in model-free linkage analysis using microsatellite or single-nucleotide polymorphism marker maps.
    Thompson CL; Baechle D; Lu Q; Mathew G; Song Y; Iyengar SK; Gray-McGuire C; Goddard KA
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S153. PubMed ID: 16451614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A statistical method for identification of polymorphisms that explain a linkage result.
    Sun L; Cox NJ; McPeek MS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):399-411. PubMed ID: 11791210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals.
    Epstein MP; Duren WL; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Nov; 67(5):1219-31. PubMed ID: 11032786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fine-scale mapping of disease loci via shattered coalescent modeling of genealogies.
    Morris AP; Whittaker JC; Balding DJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Mar; 70(3):686-707. PubMed ID: 11836651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.