These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739784)
1. Patient assessment of quality of care in a chronic peritoneal dialysis facility. Wuerth DB; Finkelstein SH; Kliger AS; Finkelstein FO Am J Kidney Dis; 2000 Apr; 35(4):638-43. PubMed ID: 10739784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patients' descriptions of specific factors leading to modality selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis. Wuerth DB; Finkelstein SH; Schwetz O; Carey H; Kliger AS; Finkelstein FO Perit Dial Int; 2002; 22(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 11990402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Barriers to utilization of chronic peritoneal dialysis in network #1, New England. Troidle L; Kliger A; Finkelstein F Perit Dial Int; 2006; 26(4):452-7. PubMed ID: 16881340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structural requirements for a successful chronic peritoneal dialysis program. Finkelstein FO Kidney Int Suppl; 2006 Nov; (103):S118-21. PubMed ID: 17080101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recovery of renal function and the discontinuation of dialysis in patients treated with continuous peritoneal dialysis. Goldstein A; Kliger AS; Finkelstein FO Perit Dial Int; 2003; 23(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 12713082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous peritoneal dialysis and the extended care facility. Carey HB; Chorney W; Pherson K; Finkelstein FO; Kliger AS Am J Kidney Dis; 2001 Mar; 37(3):580-7. PubMed ID: 11228183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationships between nurses' perceptions of the hemodialysis unit work environment and nurse turnover, patient satisfaction, and hospitalizations. Gardner JK; Thomas-Hawkins C; Fogg L; Latham CE Nephrol Nurs J; 2007; 34(3):271-81; quiz 282. PubMed ID: 17644871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association between Freestanding Dialysis Facility Size and Medicare Quality Incentive Program Performance Scores. Ajmal F; Probst J; Brooks J; Hardin J; Qureshi Z Am J Nephrol; 2019; 49(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 30557871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis undergoing peritoneal catheter removal because of peritonitis. Troidle L; Gorban-Brennan N; Finkelstein FO Adv Perit Dial; 2005; 21():98-101. PubMed ID: 16686295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient's view of dialysis care: development of a taxonomy and rating of importance of different aspects of care. CHOICE study. Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD. Rubin HR; Jenckes M; Fink NE; Meyer K; Wu AW; Bass EB; Levin N; Powe NR Am J Kidney Dis; 1997 Dec; 30(6):793-801. PubMed ID: 9398123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving adequacy of hemodialysis in Northern California ESRD patients: a final project report. Provider Participants and Medical Review Board of the TransPacific Renal Network. Brown J; Josephson M Adv Ren Replace Ther; 2000 Oct; 7(4 Suppl 1):S85-94. PubMed ID: 11053593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The John F. Maher Award Recipient Lecture 2006. The continuum of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: challenges and opportunities for chronic peritoneal dialysis in the United States. Mehrotra R Perit Dial Int; 2007; 27(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 17299144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The utility of a structured evaluation of elderly patients for continuous peritoneal dialysis. Holley JL; Foulks CJ Perit Dial Int; 1991; 11(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 1854875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems in-center hemodialysis survey. Wood R; Paoli CJ; Hays RD; Taylor-Stokes G; Piercy J; Gitlin M Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2014 Jun; 9(6):1099-108. PubMed ID: 24832092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring, managing, and improving quality in the end-stage renal disease treatment setting: peritoneal dialysis. Nissenson AR Am J Kidney Dis; 1994 Aug; 24(2):368-75. PubMed ID: 8048446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changing patterns of peritoneal dialysis utilization in the United States. Mehrotra R Perit Dial Int; 2007 Jun; 27 Suppl 2():S51-2. PubMed ID: 17556328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Process evaluation of the RaDIANT community study: a dialysis facility-level intervention to increase referral for kidney transplantation. Hamoda RE; Gander JC; McPherson LJ; Arriola KJ; Cobb L; Pastan SO; Plantinga L; Browne T; Hartmann E; Mulloy L; Zayas C; Krisher J; Patzer RE BMC Nephrol; 2018 Jan; 19(1):13. PubMed ID: 29334900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of peritoneal scintigraphy in the detection of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis complications. Tokmak H; Mudun A; Türkmen C; Sanli Y; Cantez S; Bozfakioğlu S Ren Fail; 2006; 28(8):709-13. PubMed ID: 17162431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. For-profit versus not-for-profit dialysis care for children with end stage renal disease. Furth SL; Hwang W; Neu AM; Fivush BA; Powe NR Pediatrics; 1999 Sep; 104(3 Pt 1):519-24. PubMed ID: 10469779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]