BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739969)

  • 1. Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting.
    Denney RL; Wynkoop TF
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2000 Apr; 15(2):804-28. PubMed ID: 10739969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
    Konrad N; Völlm B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists.
    Archer RP; Buffington-Vollum JK; Stredny RV; Handel RW
    J Pers Assess; 2006 Aug; 87(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 16856789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
    Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The detection of malingering in criminal forensic groups: MMPI validity scales.
    Wasyliw OE; Grossman LS; Haywood TW; Cavanaugh JL
    J Pers Assess; 1988; 52(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 3404393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The R-CRAS and insanity evaluations: a re-examination of construct validity. Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment Scales.
    Rogers R; Sewell KW
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 10398329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The expert witness in forensic psychiatry.
    Chaplow DG; Peters JL; Kydd RR
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 1476528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychiatric aspects of criminal responsibility: insanity and mitigation.
    Burrows M; Reid WH
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2011 Nov; 17(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 22108401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: from an attorney's perspective.
    Weiner BA
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 6478068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forensic neuropsychology and expert witness testimony: An overview of forensic practice.
    Leonard EL
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():177-82. PubMed ID: 26409570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The insanity defense: five years of research (1993-1997).
    Lymburner JA; Roesch R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1999; 22(3-4):213-40. PubMed ID: 10457921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments.
    Gkotsi GM; Gasser J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():58-67. PubMed ID: 27209602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Difference between the cognitive and control ability and the responsibility in forensic psychiatry evaluation].
    Li XW; Gao BL; Hu F; Wu C; Zhang H; Guan YJ; Lai W; Li Y; Wang Y; Wu DL; Cao XL
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 29(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 24350541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Ethical problems of insanity].
    Rutkowski R; Sobkowiak J
    Psychiatr Pol; 1991; 25(3-4):119-24. PubMed ID: 1821971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ethical boundaries of forensic psychiatry: a view from the ivory tower.
    Stone AA
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 6478062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Ethical problems in forensic-psychiatric assessment].
    Barbey I
    Psychiatr Prax; 1988 Sep; 15(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 3054984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.