BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739969)

  • 21. Ethical issues associated with the assessment of exaggeration, poor effort, and malingering.
    Iverson GL
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2006; 13(2):77-90. PubMed ID: 17009881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An investigation of the ECST-R in male pretrial patients: evaluating the effects of feigning on competency evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J
    Assessment; 2009 Sep; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 19779096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The psychiatrist in court.
    Grounds A
    Br J Hosp Med; 1985 Jul; 34(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 4016412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The summary mental examination in criminal proceedings.
    Nishio C
    Keio J Med; 2011; 60(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 21460600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. MMPI profiles of malingerers diagnosed in pretrial forensic evaluations.
    Hawk GL; Cornell DG
    J Clin Psychol; 1989 Jul; 45(4):673-8. PubMed ID: 2768508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The application of evaluation tools for criminal responsibility in forensic psychiatric expertise].
    Fu PX; Wang J; Shi TT; Hu JN; Zhu MX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 26(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 20707283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of the TOMM in a criminal court forensic assessment setting.
    Delain SL; Stafford KP; Ben-Porath YS
    Assessment; 2003 Dec; 10(4):370-81. PubMed ID: 14682483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Medical expert assessment in psychiatry from the legal viewpoint].
    Schreiber HL
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):626-30; discussion 631. PubMed ID: 9064936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
    Bolechała F
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Iatrogenesis and malingering of multiple personality disorder in the forensic evaluation of homicide defendants.
    Coons PM
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1991 Sep; 14(3):757-68. PubMed ID: 1946034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors related to bias in forensic psychiatric assessments in criminal matters: A systematic review.
    Meyer LF; Valença AM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 75():101681. PubMed ID: 33712325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Psychological testing and the assessment of malingering.
    McDermott BE
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 35(4):855-76. PubMed ID: 23107567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Practical ethical problems of the forensic psychiatrist in dealing with attorneys.
    Sadoff RL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 6478067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical myths of forensic neuropsychology.
    Greiffenstein MF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 18609338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Forensic assessment instruments: Their reliability and applicability to criminal forensic issues.
    Rogers R; Tazi KY; Drogin EY
    Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(5):415-431. PubMed ID: 36934388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Response from a straw man.
    Watson AS
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 6478063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Ethical aspects of forensic psychiatry].
    Muysers J
    Psychiatr Prax; 2014 Jul; 41 Suppl 1():S54-7. PubMed ID: 24983577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Assessment of Mental Disorders].
    Dreßing H; Förster K; Schneider F
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2018 Jul; 86(7):422-427. PubMed ID: 30029280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Training psychologists to function as competent scientists in criminal forensics.
    Everett ML
    New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1996; (69):49-57. PubMed ID: 8935823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An ethical framework for assessments of criminal responsibility: applying Susan Wolf's account of sanity to forensic psychiatry.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22627087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.