BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10740367)

  • 1. The fetal and neonatal outcomes of Rhesus D antibody affected pregnancies in Northern Ireland.
    Craig S; Morris K; Tubman T; McClure B
    Ir Med J; 2000; 93(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 10740367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical outcome of non-RhD antibody affected pregnancies in Northern Ireland.
    Chandrasekar A; Morris KG; Tubman TR; Tharma S; McClelland WM
    Ulster Med J; 2001 Nov; 70(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 11795772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Lloyd Jones M; Wight J; Forman K; Wray J; Beverley C
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):903-7. PubMed ID: 15327602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. Services should be centralised for pregnancies affected by RhD haemolytic disease.
    Craig JS; McClure BG; Tubman TR
    BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7144):1611. PubMed ID: 9616034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consequences of being Rhesus D immunized during pregnancy and how to optimize new prevention strategies.
    Tiblad E; Westgren M; Pasupathy D; Karlsson A; Wikman AT
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Sep; 92(9):1079-85. PubMed ID: 23750781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The pregnant Rhesus negative Nigerian woman.
    Kotila TR; Odukogbe AA; Okunlola MA; Olayemi O; Obisesan KA
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2005 Dec; 12(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 16380744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One single dose of 200 microg of antenatal RhIG halves the risk of anti-D immunization and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in the next pregnancy.
    Koelewijn JM; de Haas M; Vrijkotte TG; Bonsel GJ; van der Schoot CE
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1721-9. PubMed ID: 18507749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and patient compliance with the two-dose regimen.
    Chaffe B; Ford J; Bills V
    Transfus Med; 2007 Oct; 17(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 17903141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The importance of antenatal immunoprophylaxis for prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn].
    Starcević M; Mataija M; Sović D; Dodig J; Matijević R; Kukuruzović M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2011 Mar; 65(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21568074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Epidemiology of anti-D allo-immunization during pregnancy].
    Branger B; Winer N
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S87-1S92. PubMed ID: 16495833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the management of severe rhesus alloimmunization: first unaffected pregnancy: case report.
    Seeho SK; Burton G; Leigh D; Marshall JT; Persson JW; Morris JM
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Mar; 20(3):697-701. PubMed ID: 15661826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Prenatal immunoglobulin prevention in Rh(D)-negative nonsensitized pregnant women].
    Katsulov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1997; 36(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 9471891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causes and clinical consequences of Rhesus (D) haemolytic disease of the newborn: a study of a Scottish population, 1985-1990.
    Hughes RG; Craig JI; Murphy WG; Greer IA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 8199074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Foetomaternal erythrocyte incompatibilities: from immunohaematologic surveillance of pregnant women to haemolytic disease of the newborn].
    Miquel E; Cavelier B; Bonneau JC; Rouger P
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2005 Feb; 12(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 15814293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the immunologic basis of Rh immune globulin (anti-D) prophylaxis.
    Kumpel BM
    Transfusion; 2006 Sep; 46(9):1652-6. PubMed ID: 16965599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Haemolytic disease of the newborn: the new NICE guidelines.
    Thompson J
    J Fam Health Care; 2002; 12(5):133-6. PubMed ID: 12449064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of maternal alloimmunisation to Rh D in Northern Ireland.
    McCauley CJ; Morris K; Maguire K
    Transfus Med; 2017 Apr; 27(2):132-135. PubMed ID: 28101958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The investigation of infants with RhD-negative mothers: can we safely omit the umbilical cord blood direct antiglobulin test?
    James RM; McGuire W; Smith DP
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2011 Jul; 96(4):F301-4. PubMed ID: 20659940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Rhesus prophylaxis--history and current status].
    Behrens O; Lellé RJ
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(5):204-10. PubMed ID: 9281253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An increased risk for non allo-immunization related intrauterine fetal death in RhD-negative patients.
    Ben-David G; Sheiner E; Levy A; Erez O; Mazor M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Apr; 21(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 18330822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.