These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10740378)

  • 1. [Adulteration of urine drug testing--an exaggerated cause of concern].
    Beck O; Bohlin M; Bragd F; Bragd J; Greitz O
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(7):703-6. PubMed ID: 10740378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of spot tests with AdultaCheck 6 and Intect 7 urine test strips for detecting the presence of adulterants in urine specimens.
    Dasgupta A; Chughtai O; Hannah C; Davis B; Wells A
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Oct; 348(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 15369731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation into the extent of possible dilution of specimens received for urinary drugs of abuse screening.
    George S; Braithwaite RA
    Addiction; 1995 Jul; 90(7):967-70. PubMed ID: 7663318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of AdultaCheck 4 test strips for the detection of adulteration at the point of collection of urine specimens used for drugs-of-abuse testing.
    King EJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 1999; 23(1):72. PubMed ID: 10022215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How effective are screening tests for microalbuminuria in random urine specimens?
    Lum G
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2000 Oct; 30(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 11045765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The U.S. Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs: current status and future considerations.
    Bush DM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jan; 174(2-3):111-9. PubMed ID: 17434274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adulterants in Urine Drug Testing.
    Fu S
    Adv Clin Chem; 2016; 76():123-63. PubMed ID: 27645818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A procedure for the detection of Stealth adulterant in urine samples.
    Valtier S; Cody JT
    Clin Lab Sci; 2002; 15(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12776774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid spot tests for detecting the presence of adulterants in urine specimens submitted for drug testing.
    Dasgupta A; Wahed A; Wells A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Feb; 117(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 11863230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False-positive crystals in urine from contamination by Multistix 10 SG reagent strips for urinalysis.
    Kim JY; Patel S; Dighe AS
    Lab Hematol; 2009; 15(4):35-7. PubMed ID: 19923103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of fluid load on human urine characteristics related to workplace drug testing.
    Chaturvedi AK; Sershon JL; Craft KJ; Cardona PS; Soper JW; Canfield DV; Dubowski KM; Whinnery JE; Leyva MJ; Aston CE; Blevins SM; Wright JE; Fraser AD; Kuntz DJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 2013; 37(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 23104711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance evaluation of three on-site adulterant detection devices for urine specimens.
    Peace MR; Tarnai LD
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):464-70. PubMed ID: 12423001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Usefulness of protein/creatinine ratio in spot urine using test strips].
    Naka C; Takahashi H; Shiba K; Fujita Y; Fukuta I; Kosaka H; Sakamoto H
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Sep; 53(9):810-7. PubMed ID: 16235833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Urine drug screens.
    Cockrell K
    Indiana Med; 1991 Jun; 84(6):416-7. PubMed ID: 1918913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Specimen validity testing in urine drug monitoring of medications and illicit drugs: clinical implications.
    Kirsh KL; Christo PJ; Heit H; Steffel K; Passik SD
    J Opioid Manag; 2015; 11(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 25750165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory-based quality assurance programme for near-patient urine dipstick testing, 1990-1997: development, management and results.
    Tighe P
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1999; 56(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 10492909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal bedside urinalysis for the detection of proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy: a study of diagnostic accuracy.
    Waugh JJ; Bell SC; Kilby MD; Blackwell CN; Seed P; Shennan AH; Halligan AW
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 15777437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS: comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories.
    Lu NT; Taylor BG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):106-16. PubMed ID: 15899564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interferences with urine drug screens.
    Herring C; Muzyk AJ; Johnston C
    J Pharm Pract; 2011 Feb; 24(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 21507878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Catching Fakes: New Markers of Urine Sample Validity and Invalidity.
    Goggin MM; Tann CM; Miller A; Nguyen A; Janis GC
    J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 41(2):121-126. PubMed ID: 27881620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.