These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10740383)

  • 1. [The National Board of Health and Welfare: stronger evidence basis for the benefits of mammography].
    Rosén M; Nyström L; Stenbeck M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(7):739-40. PubMed ID: 10740383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The debate on mammography--the National Board of Health and Welfare is answering Sjonell and Stahle].
    Rosén M; Stenbeck M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(8):859-60. PubMed ID: 10741028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The debate on breast cancer screening with mammography is important.
    Gøtzsche PC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 17411511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The National Board of Health and Welfare on mammographic screening: mortality analysis requires completely different methods].
    Rehnqvist N; Rosén M; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(9):1050-1. PubMed ID: 10093453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography may not be effective at any age.
    Wilkerson BF; Schooff M
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Apr; 49(4):302, 371. PubMed ID: 10778833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Make an independent assessment of mammographic screening!].
    Einhorn J
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar; 97(12):1366-7. PubMed ID: 10765617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Swedish mammography screening trials. Check up on your sources.
    Dean PB
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jun; 97(25):3105-6. PubMed ID: 10911709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
    Jaillon P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Does organized mammographic screening reduce breast cancer mortality? The Cancer Registry's view on the current debate].
    Wang H; Hofvind S; Tretli S; Thoresen S; Langmark F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Jan; 122(2):211-3. PubMed ID: 11873583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are there downsides to mammography screening?
    Baines CJ
    Breast J; 2005; 11 Suppl 1():S7-10. PubMed ID: 15725116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for breast cancer.
    Duffy SW; Smith RA; Gabe R; Tabár L; Yen AM; Chen TH
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):671-97. PubMed ID: 16226686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Update on effects of screening mammography.
    Gulbrandsen P
    Lancet; 2002 Jul; 360(9329):339; author reply 339-40. PubMed ID: 12147397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [There is something wrong in the studies of mammography! No support for the conclusions on benefits of breast cancer screening].
    Olsen O; Gøtzsche PC
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jan; 97(4):286-7. PubMed ID: 10684221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammograms do save lives, says a new study.
    Levenson D
    Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2002 Aug; 13(16):5-7. PubMed ID: 12564430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evidence-based radiotherapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer: results in the 1990-ies].
    Fodor J; Polgár C; Németh G
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(28):1551-5. PubMed ID: 10957865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New guidelines, research add to mammography controversy.
    Levenson D
    Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2002 Sep; 13(18):1-2, 5. PubMed ID: 12577912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gøtzsche's quixotic antiscreening campaign: nonscientific and contrary to Cochrane principles.
    Dean PB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 17411510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Making evidence-based decisions in medicine: (or more importantly) using evidence when the case doesn't quite fit.
    Flood AB
    Womens Health Issues; 2004; 14(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 15001181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surrogate markers in AIDS and cancer trials.
    Day NE; Duffy SW
    Stat Med; 1995 Dec; 14(23):2619-20. PubMed ID: 8801623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.