These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10740383)

  • 21. The mammography consensus jury speaks out.
    Nelson NJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Mar; 89(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 9060955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Unsatisfactory documentation of conclusions in guidelines on mammography].
    Lenner P; Jonsson H
    Lakartidningen; 1998 Jul; 95(28-29):3154-6. PubMed ID: 9700252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Update on effects of screening mammography.
    Gøtzsche PC
    Lancet; 2002 Jul; 360(9329):338-9; author reply 339-40. PubMed ID: 12147395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence, not politics, should guide cancer care.
    Carroll SA
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2010 Aug; 14(4):401. PubMed ID: 20682495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The mammographic screening trials: commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gøtzsche.
    Duffy SW; Tabár L; Smith RA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2002; 52(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 11929006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On being the right size: a reappraisal of mammography trials in Canada and Sweden.
    Narod SA
    Lancet; 1997 Jun; 349(9068):1846. PubMed ID: 9269247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Some glipses from the history of mammography: from radiography of preparations to general screening].
    Andersson I
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1329-33. PubMed ID: 8656864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Criticisms of Swedish mammography trials were wrong.
    Tabar L; Duffy SW
    BMJ; 1999 Nov; 319(7221):1367. PubMed ID: 10567156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The zero hypothesis "proven"--a common misunderstanding].
    Taube A
    Lakartidningen; 1993 Feb; 90(8):684. PubMed ID: 8437487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evidence-based medicine in breast cancer.
    Sledge GW
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2007 Feb; 7(6):435. PubMed ID: 17386128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Breast feeding is not a decree from the National Board of Health and Welfare].
    Rehnqvist N; Swartling PG; Hofvander Y; Sundelin C
    Lakartidningen; 1997 Sep; 94(39):3379. PubMed ID: 9379803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [SBU: Help us find examples of health care that is not evidence-based].
    Rosén M; Mowafi F; Pettersson A; Tranaeus S; Werkö S
    Lakartidningen; 2012 Sep 26-Oct 9; 109(39-40):1720-1. PubMed ID: 23097875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. More mammo squabbles.
    Linton O
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):541-2. PubMed ID: 20207321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can Observational Data Replace Randomized Trials?
    McGale P; Cutter D; Darby SC; Henson KE; Jagsi R; Taylor CW
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Sep; 34(27):3355-7. PubMed ID: 27458289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The National Board of Health and Welfare changes tracks for medical specialties classification].
    Kvist U; Printz A; Nobel F
    Lakartidningen; 2011 Oct 12-18; 108(41):2035. PubMed ID: 22111252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The National Board of Health and Welfare must elucidate the role of standby duty].
    Hemlin J; Björkman G
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Nov; 93(46):4137. PubMed ID: 8984262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast cancer: more clarity or more confusion?
    Ann Oncol; 1993 May; 4(5):343-4. PubMed ID: 8353064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The National Board of Health and Welfare: stronger evidence basis for the benefits of mammography].
    Rosén M; Nyström L; Stenbeck M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(7):739-40. PubMed ID: 10740383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The debate on mammography--the National Board of Health and Welfare is answering Sjonell and Stahle].
    Rosén M; Stenbeck M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(8):859-60. PubMed ID: 10741028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The debate on breast cancer screening with mammography is important.
    Gøtzsche PC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 17411511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.