164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10740466)
1. Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography.
Cavalcanti MG; Yang J; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 10740466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of spiral computed tomography for dental implants.
Cavalcanti MG; Yang J; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):329-33. PubMed ID: 10895630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants.
Yang J; Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Mar; 87(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10102603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D volume rendering using multislice CT for dental implants.
Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 12087438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of maxillary incisive canal characteristics related to dental implant treatment with computerized tomography: a clinical multicenter study.
Tözüm TF; Güncü GN; Yıldırım YD; Yılmaz HG; Galindo-Moreno P; Velasco-Torres M; Al-Hezaimi K; Al-Sadhan R; Karabulut E; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 21910596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dental implant treatment planning with reformatted computed tomography.
Besimo C; Lambrecht JT; Nidecker A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 9161173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative analysis of spiral computed tomography for craniofacial clinical applications.
Cavalcanti MG; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 10895633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative bone width of the edentulous maxillary ridge. Clinical implications of digital assessment in presurgical implant planning.
Katsoulis J; Enkling N; Takeichi T; Urban IA; Mericske-Stern R; Avrampou M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e213-23. PubMed ID: 22375945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement.
Chen LC; Lundgren T; Hallström H; Cherel F
J Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 18315421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography.
Bornstein MM; Balsiger R; Sendi P; von Arx T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 21039896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images.
de Oliveira RC; Leles CR; Normanha LM; Lindh C; Ribeiro-Rotta RF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 18230392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement.
Fatemitabar SA; Nikgoo A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):499-505. PubMed ID: 20556248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery.
Jacobs R; Adriansens A; Verstreken K; Suetens P; van Steenberghe D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 10522199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there a gender difference in anatomic features of incisive canal and maxillary environmental bone?
Güncü GN; Yıldırım YD; Yılmaz HG; Galindo-Moreno P; Velasco-Torres M; Al-Hezaimi K; Al-Shawaf R; Karabulut E; Wang HL; Tözüm TF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1023-6. PubMed ID: 22587805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphologic changes of the nasopalatine canal related to dental implantation: a radiologic study in different degrees of absorbed maxillae.
Mardinger O; Namani-Sadan N; Chaushu G; Schwartz-Arad D
J Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 79(9):1659-62. PubMed ID: 18771366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using interactive technology: in the zone with the Triangle of Bone.
Ganz SD
Dent Implantol Update; 2008 May; 19(5):33-8. PubMed ID: 18686891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
