These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10740505)

  • 1. Comparison of perceptions of computer-animated left- and right-facing profiles.
    Anderson NK; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Jun; 8(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 10740505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences.
    Giddon DB; Sconzo R; Kinchen JA; Evans CA
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 8974180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Presurgical profile preferences of patients and clinicians.
    Arpino VJ; Giddon DB; BeGole EA; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Dec; 114(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 9844201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two computer animated imaging programs for quantifying facial profile preference.
    Giddon DB; Bernier DL; Evans CA; Kinchen JA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1251-64. PubMed ID: 8823891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Profile preferences of Korean American orthodontic patients and orthodontists.
    Park YS; Evans CA; Viana G; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 17009479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians.
    Mejia-Maidl M; Evans CA; Viana G; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):953-8. PubMed ID: 16448237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of magnitude of horizontal and vertical deformation on preference for morphed faces.
    Giddon DB; Rains CE; Evans CA; Clemens IK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Dec; 85(3 Pt 2):1303-13. PubMed ID: 9450284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-animated comparison of self-perception with actual profiles of orthodontic and nonorthodontic subjects.
    Kitay D; BeGole EA; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 10686835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective.
    Chan EK; Soh J; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 18405817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial profile preferences of black women before and after orthodontic treatment.
    McKoy-White J; Evans CA; Viana G; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 16443473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perception of children's computer-imaged facial profiles by patients, mothers and clinicians.
    Miner RM; Anderson NK; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1034-9. PubMed ID: 18004912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Investigation on facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients].
    Wang YY; Guo CC; Zhou C; Fan ML; Wang WC; Bao BC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Dec; 21(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 23364553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.
    Coleman GG; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17628248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of facial esthetics by native Chinese participants by using manipulated digital imagery techniques.
    Maganzini AL; Tseng JY; Epstein JZ
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):393-9. PubMed ID: 11037000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population.
    Mantzikos T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jul; 114(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9674673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
    Holdaway RA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
    Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.