These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10740885)

  • 1. Simulation studies of optimum energies for DXA: dependence on tissue type, patient size and dose model.
    Michael GJ; Henderson CJ
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Dec; 22(4):126-35. PubMed ID: 10740885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo modelling of an extended DXA technique.
    Michael GJ; Henderson CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Sep; 43(9):2583-96. PubMed ID: 9755947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions.
    Bolotin HH; Sievänen H; Grashuis JL
    J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1020-7. PubMed ID: 12817754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new perspective on the causal influence of soft tissue composition on DXA-measured in vivo bone mineral density.
    Bolotin HH
    J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Nov; 13(11):1739-46. PubMed ID: 9797483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The significant effects of bone structure on inherent patient-specific DXA in vivo bone mineral density measurement inaccuracies.
    Bolotin HH
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):774-88. PubMed ID: 15124995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inaccuracies inherent in patient-specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density measurements: comprehensive phantom-based evaluation.
    Bolotin HH; Sievänen H; Grashuis JL; Kuiper JW; Järvinen TL
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Feb; 16(2):417-26. PubMed ID: 11204442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
    Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Monte Carlo model for bone mineral measurement using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Michael GJ; Sim LH; van Doorn T
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Jun; 20(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 9262027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Errors in dual-energy X-ray scanning of the hip because of nonuniform fat distribution.
    Tothill P; Weir N; Loveland J
    J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 23522983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytic and quantitative exposition of patient-specific systematic inaccuracies inherent in planar DXA-derived in vivo BMD measurements.
    Bolotin HH
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 9507473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-energy bone densitometry using a single 100 ns x-ray pulse.
    Seely JF; Boyer CN; Holland GE
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2027-36. PubMed ID: 9800712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectral optimization for micro-CT.
    Hupfer M; Nowak T; Brauweiler R; Eisa F; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3229-39. PubMed ID: 22755706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition.
    Laskey MA
    Nutrition; 1996 Jan; 12(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 8838836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry on pig carcasses.
    Kipper M; Marcoux M; Andretta I; Pomar C
    J Anim Sci; 2018 May; 96(5):2027-2037. PubMed ID: 29722809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose to tissue medium or water cavities as surrogate for the dose to cell nuclei at brachytherapy photon energies.
    Enger SA; Ahnesjö A; Verhaegen F; Beaulieu L
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(14):4489-500. PubMed ID: 22722477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Body composition by DXA: tried and true?
    Kohrt WM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Oct; 27(10):1349-53. PubMed ID: 8531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation dose and in vitro precision in paediatric bone mineral density measurement using dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Njeh CF; Samat SB; Nightingale A; McNeil EA; Boivin CM
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):719-27. PubMed ID: 9245884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in body composition as determinants of longitudinal changes in bone mineral measures in 8 to 26-year-old female twins.
    Young D; Hopper JL; Macinnis RJ; Nowson CA; Hoang NH; Wark JD
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):506-15. PubMed ID: 11446568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Wilkinson S
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):166-76. PubMed ID: 11718390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft tissue composition and bone mineral status: evaluation by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Lukaski HC
    J Nutr; 1993 Feb; 123(2 Suppl):438-43. PubMed ID: 8429400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.