These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10740958)

  • 1. How do people evaluate social sexual conduct at work? A psycholegal model.
    Wiener RL; Hurt LE
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Feb; 85(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 10740958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of sexual harassment: the effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism.
    Wiener RL; Hurt L; Russell B; Mannen K; Gasper C
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Feb; 21(1):71-93. PubMed ID: 9058574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender influence on perceptions of hostile environment sexual harassment.
    Baird CL; Bensko NL; Bell PA; Viney W; Woody WD
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Aug; 77(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 7501779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The fit and implementation of sexual harassment law to workplace evaluations.
    Wiener RL; Hackney A; Kadela K; Rauch S; Seib H; Warren L; Hurt LE
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Aug; 87(4):747-64. PubMed ID: 12184578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The objective prong in sexual harassment: What is the standard?
    Wiener RL; Vardsveen TC
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Dec; 42(6):545-557. PubMed ID: 30272458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace.
    Hurt LE; Wiener RL; Russell BL; Mannen RK
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(4):413-33. PubMed ID: 10653991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting Sexual Harassment From Hostile Sexism and Short-Term Mating Orientation: Relative Strength of Predictors Depends on Situational Priming of Power Versus Sex.
    Diehl C; Rees J; Bohner G
    Violence Against Women; 2018 Feb; 24(2):123-143. PubMed ID: 27940501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reasonable woman standard: effects on sexual harassment court decisions.
    Perry EL; Kulik CT; Bourhis AC
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Feb; 28(1):9-27. PubMed ID: 15055339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explaining sexual harassment judgments: looking beyond gender of the rater.
    O'Connor M; Gutek BA; Stockdale M; Geer TM; Melançon R
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Feb; 28(1):69-95. PubMed ID: 15055342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of harassment severity and organizational behavior on damage awards in a hostile work environment sexual harassment case.
    Cass SA; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 19579260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception Differences in Ambiguous Forms of Workplace Sexual Harassment: A Comparison between the United States and Turkey.
    Toker Y
    J Psychol; 2016 Jul; 150(5):625-43. PubMed ID: 27027729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.
    Rotundo M; Nguyen DH; Sackett PR
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):914-22. PubMed ID: 11596807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reasonable woman standard: a meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.
    Blumenthal JA
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Feb; 22(1):33-57. PubMed ID: 9487790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of prior workplace behavior on subsequent sexual harassment judgments.
    Wiener RL; Winter R; Rogers M; Arnot L
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Feb; 28(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 15055341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flirting with disaster: short-term mating orientation and hostile sexism predict different types of sexual harassment.
    Diehl C; Rees J; Bohner G
    Aggress Behav; 2012; 38(6):521-31. PubMed ID: 22806316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "It was only harmless banter!" The development and preliminary validation of the moral disengagement in sexual harassment scale.
    Page TE; Pina A; Giner-Sorolla R
    Aggress Behav; 2016; 42(3):254-73. PubMed ID: 26350167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of workplace social-sexual behavior as sexual harassment post #MeToo in Scandinavia.
    Kessler AM; Kennair LEO; Grøntvedt TV; Bjørkheim I; Drejer I; Bendixen M
    Scand J Psychol; 2021 Dec; 62(6):846-857. PubMed ID: 34235771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective sexual harassment: differential treatment of similar groups of women workers.
    Hoffmann EA
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Feb; 28(1):29-45. PubMed ID: 15055340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual harassment: the "reasonable person" vs "reasonable woman" standards have not been resolved.
    Woody WD; Viney W; Bell PA; Bensko NL
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Feb; 78(1):329-30. PubMed ID: 8839324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The scoop on harassment and hostile work environments.
    Szczepanski A
    Mich Nurse; 2007; 80(3):10. PubMed ID: 17626521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.