BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10742969)

  • 21. Some problems with the investigation of noninferiority in meta-analysis.
    Witte S; Victor N
    Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 15702203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimal design of clinical outcome studies in nutrition and cancer: future directions.
    Maliakkal RJ; Blackburn GL; Willcutts HD; Williams M; Levin R; Willcutts HD; Elashoff R
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1992; 16(6 Suppl):112S-116S. PubMed ID: 1287222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials.
    Baujat B; Mahé C; Pignon JP; Hill C
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2641-52. PubMed ID: 12228882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mega-trials vs. meta-analysis: precision vs. heterogeneity?
    Shrier I; Platt RW; Steele RJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 May; 28(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17188025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Proper analysis in clinical trials: how to report and adjust for missing outcome data.
    Joshi M; Royuela A; Zamora J
    BJOG; 2013 Jul; 120(8):915-9. PubMed ID: 23759083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Meta-analysis and meta-analytic monitoring of clinical trials.
    Feinstein AR
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1273-80; discussion 1281-3. PubMed ID: 8817801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Magnitude of effects in clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals.
    Siontis KC; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 40(5):1280-91. PubMed ID: 22039194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: needs, resources and challenges.
    Xu H; Platt RW; Luo ZC; Wei S; Fraser WD
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 22 Suppl 1():18-28. PubMed ID: 18237348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
    Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials.
    Hewitt CE; Kumaravel B; Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1264-70. PubMed ID: 20573482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analyses of chronic disease trials with competing causes of death may yield biased odds ratios.
    Koller MT; Stijnen T; Steyerberg EW; Lubsen J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 18313561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials: an empirical example.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ; Mozurkewich EL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Mar; 32(2):288-98. PubMed ID: 21147265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews.
    Glasziou PP; Shepperd S; Brassey J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Mar; 10():23. PubMed ID: 20298582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combination antimicrobial treatment versus monotherapy: the contribution of meta-analyses.
    Paul M; Leibovici L
    Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 23(2):277-93. PubMed ID: 19393909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
    Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meta-analysis.
    Rosenfeld RM
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2004; 66(4):186-95. PubMed ID: 15467343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.