BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10743382)

  • 1. Untrained speakers' use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation and listeners' interpretations.
    Tree JE; Meijer PJ
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10743382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communicative Context Affects Use of Referential Prosody.
    Tzeng CY; Namy LL; Nygaard LC
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 43(11):e12799. PubMed ID: 31742754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity.
    Allbritton DW; McKoon G; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):714-35. PubMed ID: 8656153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Syntactic structure guides prosody in temporarily ambiguous sentences.
    Anderson C; Carlson K
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 4):472-93. PubMed ID: 21313990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosodic cue weighting in the processing of ambiguous sentences by native English listeners and Korean listeners of English.
    Baek H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jan; 151(1):158. PubMed ID: 35105020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.
    Schafer AJ; Speer SR; Warren P; White SD
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2000 Mar; 29(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 10709182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guess who? Children use prosody to infer intended listeners.
    Varghese AL; Nilsen ES
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2016 Jun; 34(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 26871544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.
    Kakouros S; Salminen N; Räsänen O
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():181-199. PubMed ID: 29247667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of prosodic boundaries on comprehension of spoken English sentences.
    Blasko DG; Hall MD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 9760620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of affective prosody by young and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Mar; 25(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 20230124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects and limitations of prosodic and semantic biases on syntactic disambiguation.
    Misono Y; Mazuka R; Kondo T; Kiritani S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1997 Mar; 26(2):229-45. PubMed ID: 9110434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural substrates of linguistic prosody: evidence from syntactic disambiguation in the productions of brain-damaged patients.
    Shah AP; Baum SR; Dwivedi VD
    Brain Lang; 2006 Jan; 96(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 15922444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prosody and Semantics Are Separate but Not Separable Channels in the Perception of Emotional Speech: Test for Rating of Emotions in Speech.
    Ben-David BM; Multani N; Shakuf V; Rudzicz F; van Lieshout PH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 59(1):72-89. PubMed ID: 26903033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Role of Fundamental Frequency and Temporal Envelope in Processing Sentences with Temporary Syntactic Ambiguities.
    Sharpe V; Fogerty D; den Ouden DB
    Lang Speech; 2017 Sep; 60(3):399-426. PubMed ID: 28915784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related impairments in the revision of syntactic misanalyses: effects of prosody.
    Titone DA; Koh CK; Kjelgaard MM; Bruce S; Speer SR; Wingfield A
    Lang Speech; 2006; 49(Pt 1):75-99. PubMed ID: 16922063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constituent length affects prosody and processing for a dative NP ambiguity in Korean.
    Hwang H; Schafer AJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Mar; 38(2):151-75. PubMed ID: 19067169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timing of Syntactic and Rhythmic Effects on Ambiguity Resolution in Turkish: A Phoneme Restoration Study.
    Deniz ND; Fodor JD
    Lang Speech; 2020 Dec; 63(4):832-855. PubMed ID: 31868561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phrasal prosody constrains syntactic analysis in toddlers.
    de Carvalho A; Dautriche I; Lin I; Christophe A
    Cognition; 2017 Jun; 163():67-79. PubMed ID: 28288369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.