132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10744498)
21. [Is the informed consent always required?].
Tobias JS
Recenti Prog Med; 1998 Nov; 89(11):549-51. PubMed ID: 9844438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Potential conflict between fundamental ethical principles and requirements of the oncology drug approval process: ethical conflict in drug approval.
Markman M; DeMarco J
Cancer; 2003 Jul; 98(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 12872337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimizing the consent process for organ donation.
Kay NA; Barone BM
J S C Med Assoc; 1998 Feb; 94(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 9509807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Anthropological-ethical principles of so-called patient education].
Virt G
Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(9-10):213-4. PubMed ID: 11475095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Medical research: why trouble the patient for informed consent?
Farnell SM
Med Pediatr Oncol; 2002 Sep; 39(3):207-9; discussion 210-1. PubMed ID: 12210453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The fiduciary obligation of physicians to "just say no" if an "informed" patient demands services that are not medically indicated.
Hafemeister TL; Gulbrandsen RM
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2009; 39(2):335-86. PubMed ID: 19462539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Randomization and ethics. Careful planning solves many information problems].
Holmberg L; Taube A; Glimelius B
Lakartidningen; 1992 May; 89(22):1982. PubMed ID: 1630212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Very limited role of psychiatry in late termination.
Ryan CJ; Shaw T
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 42(2):173-4. PubMed ID: 18354818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Physicians and the press.
Fabro F
Conn Med; 1978 Jan; 42(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 11643430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Symposium on consent and confidentiality. J Med Ethics 2003;29:2-40.
Schildmann J; Cushing A; Doyal L; Vollmann J
J Med Ethics; 2004 Dec; 30(6):609. PubMed ID: 15574457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Unethical practices.
Abraham J
Issues Med Ethics; 2002; 10(4):85-6. PubMed ID: 16335492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Patients and physicians as obstacles to a randomized trial.
Lacher MJ
Semin Oncol; 1981 Dec; 8(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 7323814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in pediatric and adult oncology.
Simon CM; Siminoff LA; Kodish ED; Burant C
J Clin Oncol; 2004 Jul; 22(13):2708-17. PubMed ID: 15226338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Ethical problems in randomized clinical trials from the aspect of statistics. Part I. Is patient randomization acceptable from the ethical viewpoint?].
Haas T
Cas Lek Cesk; 2001 Jun; 140(11):335-42. PubMed ID: 11431853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. New designs for clinical trials.
Mélot C
Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1 Suppl):S59-64. PubMed ID: 19104226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Some legal and ethical implications for the medical profession.
Mathiharan K
Issues Med Ethics; 2002; 10(4):79-82. PubMed ID: 16335490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials.
Miller FG; Brody H
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):19-28. PubMed ID: 12854452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Commentary: an imperfect compromise.
Dennis M
BMJ; 2003 Aug; 327(7409):286. PubMed ID: 12896946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [The physician and large trials: whether healer or researcher].
Geraci E
G Ital Cardiol; 1993 Aug; 23(8):757. PubMed ID: 8119498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Fumes from the spleen.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 1989 Oct; 3(4):353-5. PubMed ID: 2587404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
