These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10745294)

  • 21. The failure of dose-response models to predict low dose effects: a major challenge for biomedical, toxicological and aging research.
    Calabrese EJ
    Biogerontology; 2006 Apr; 7(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 16802115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hormesis: why it is important to toxicology and toxicologists.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Jul; 27(7):1451-74. PubMed ID: 18275256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The discovery of x-rays and its direct consequences. A historical overview].
    Velders XL; van der Stelt PF
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1987 Jun; 94(6):254-8. PubMed ID: 3313078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Getting the dose-response wrong: why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted.
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2009 Mar; 83(3):227-47. PubMed ID: 19234688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Utilization of developmental basic science principles in the evaluation of reproductive risks from pre- and postconception environmental radiation exposures.
    Brent RL
    Teratology; 1999 Apr; 59(4):182-204. PubMed ID: 10331519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Muller's Nobel lecture on dose-response for ionizing radiation: ideology or science?
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 85(12):1495-8. PubMed ID: 21717110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biological effects of low level exposures to ionizing radiation: theory and practice.
    Liu SZ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 20332172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():452-458. PubMed ID: 27974149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [M. N. Livanov's studies on the consequences of exposure to ionizing radiation].
    Gus'kova AK
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2007; 57(5):633-5. PubMed ID: 18064903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Scientific contributions of Roy Ernest Albert (1924-2002), a pioneer in radiation risk assessment and its application to public policy.
    Lippmann M
    Radiat Res; 2003 Jul; 160(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 12816532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():435-451. PubMed ID: 28109526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Leukemia incidence of 96,000 Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors is compelling evidence that the LNT model is wrong: Edward Calabrese's papers "Origin of the linear no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept" (Arch Toxicol (2013) 87:1621-1633) and "How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response" (Arch Toxicol (2013) 87:2063-2081).
    Cuttler JM
    Arch Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 88(3):847-8. PubMed ID: 24504164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Paradigm lost, paradigm found: the re-emergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose response model in the toxicological sciences.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Pollut; 2005 Dec; 138(3):379-411. PubMed ID: 16098930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hormesis: improving predictions in the low-dose zone.
    Calabrese EJ
    Exp Suppl; 2012; 101():551-64. PubMed ID: 22945582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields.
    IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans
    IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum; 2002; 80():1-395. PubMed ID: 12071196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Radiation risks and their prevention].
    Rytömaa T
    Duodecim; 2003; 119(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 12607426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hormesis: principles and applications.
    Calabrese EJ
    Homeopathy; 2015 Apr; 104(2):69-82. PubMed ID: 25869971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Historical perspective of normal tissue tolerance or stumbling along the pathway of dose response to necrosis and back.
    Moss W
    Front Radiat Ther Oncol; 1989; 23():1-6. PubMed ID: 2697648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recent discoveries on the historical foundations of cancer risk assessment: Shedding light on the limits of LNT.
    Calabrese E; Giordano J; Selby PB
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Sep; 941():173676. PubMed ID: 38823696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Toxicological awakenings: the rebirth of hormesis as a central pillar of toxicology.
    Calabrese EJ
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Apr; 204(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15781288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.