These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10745685)

  • 21. Current controversies in data monitoring for clinical trials.
    Pocock SJ
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(6):513-21. PubMed ID: 17170035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving outcomes with long-term "destination" therapy using left ventricular assist devices.
    Long JW; Healy AH; Rasmusson BY; Cowley CG; Nelson KE; Kfoury AG; Clayson SE; Reid BB; Moore SA; Blank DU; Renlund DG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 135(6):1353-60; discussion 1360-1. PubMed ID: 18544385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The ethics of early stopping rules: who is protecting whom?
    Cannistra SA
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(9):1542-5. PubMed ID: 15117977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comment: dealing ethically with an inevitable tension.
    Montello M
    J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(2):119-21. PubMed ID: 11642061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 1. Failure to gain "coal-face" commitment and to use the uncertainty principle.
    Sackett DL
    CMAJ; 2000 May; 162(9):1311-4. PubMed ID: 10813014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Non-inferiority trials: design concepts and issues - the encounters of academic consultants in statistics.
    D'Agostino RB; Massaro JM; Sullivan LM
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 12520555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Randomized consent designs in randomized controlled trials: systematic literature search.
    Schellings R; Kessels AG; ter Riet G; Knottnerus JA; Sturmans F
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Aug; 27(4):320-32. PubMed ID: 16388991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Why and how randomise a clinical trial?].
    Chevret S
    Rev Mal Respir; 2003 Nov; 20(5 Pt 1):753-6. PubMed ID: 14631255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surgical and oncology trials for rectal cancer: who will participate?
    Harrison JD; Solomon MJ; Young JM; Meagher A; Hruby G; Salkeld G; Clarke S
    Surgery; 2007 Jul; 142(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 17630005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Failure to adopt beneficial therapies caused by bias in medical evidence evaluation.
    Aberegg SK; Arkes H; Terry PB
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(6):575-82. PubMed ID: 17099195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Uncertainty about clinical equipoise. There is another exchange on equipoise and uncertainty.
    Sackett DL
    BMJ; 2001 Mar; 322(7289):795-6. PubMed ID: 11282879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Various randomized designs can be used to evaluate medical tests.
    Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 18945590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors determining participation in prevention trials among systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a qualitative study.
    Costenbader KH; Brome D; Blanch D; Gall V; Karlson E; Liang MH
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Feb; 57(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 17266094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.
    Scales CD; Norris RD; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Peterson BL; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1463-7. PubMed ID: 18710745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Primary care patients' involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression.
    Clever SL; Ford DE; Rubenstein LV; Rost KM; Meredith LS; Sherbourne CD; Wang NY; Arbelaez JJ; Cooper LA
    Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):398-405. PubMed ID: 16641657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Placebo-controlled studies in depression: necessary, ethical and feasible.
    Baldwin D; Broich K; Fritze J; Kasper S; Westenberg H; Möller HJ
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 253(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 12664309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Ethical problems in randomized clinical trials from the aspect of statistics. Part I. Is patient randomization acceptable from the ethical viewpoint?].
    Haas T
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2001 Jun; 140(11):335-42. PubMed ID: 11431853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Ethic problems of randomized trials].
    Vlasov VV
    Ter Arkh; 2000; 72(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 10717937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Probability and medical decision making: a politically incorrect view.
    Gage JS
    MD Comput; 1993; 10(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 8469100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Defending the controlled trial.
    Lancet; 1980 Oct; 2(8197):731. PubMed ID: 6106836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.