These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10745982)

  • 1. Reference range and method comparison studies for enzymatic and Jaffé creatinine assays in plasma and serum and early morning urine.
    Mazzachi BC; Peake MJ; Ehrhardt V
    Clin Lab; 2000; 46(1-2):53-5. PubMed ID: 10745982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of reference intervals for serum creatinine, creatinine excretion and creatinine clearance with an enzymatic and a modified Jaffé method.
    Junge W; Wilke B; Halabi A; Klein G
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Jun; 344(1-2):137-48. PubMed ID: 15149882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A specific fully enzymatic method for creatinine: reference values in serum (author's transl)].
    Börner U; Szász G; Bablok W; Busch EW
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1979 Nov; 17(11):679-82. PubMed ID: 547028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glomerular filtration rate estimates based on serum creatinine level in healthy people: conventional Jaffe method versus calibrated Jaffe method at laboratories in Rasht.
    Badeli H; Sadeghi M; Khalili Pour E; Heidarzadeh A
    Iran J Kidney Dis; 2009 Jan; 3(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 19377259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation of serum creatinine, cystatin C, and creatinine clearance tests in persons with normal renal function.
    Toffaletti JG; McDonnell EH
    Clin Chim Acta; 2008 Sep; 395(1-2):115-9. PubMed ID: 18573244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Direct estimation of creatinine in serum and in urine without deproteinization using a modified Jaffé method].
    Helger R; Rindfrey H; Hilgenfeldt J
    Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem; 1974 Jul; 12(7):344-9. PubMed ID: 4428848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Serum cystatin C as an endogenous parameter of the renal function in patients with normal to moderately impaired kidney function.
    Randers E; Erlandsen EJ; Pedersen OL; Hasling C; Danielsen H
    Clin Nephrol; 2000 Sep; 54(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 11020018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endogenous creatinine clearance during pregnancy. II. Variations in normal standards based on methodology.
    Abdul-Karim RW; Harris JE; Beydoun SN; Cuenca VG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Apr; 51(4):431-2. PubMed ID: 662225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of a compensated Jaffe creatinine method on the estimation of glomerular filtration rate.
    Chan MH; Ng KF; Szeto CC; Lit LC; Chow KM; Leung CB; Suen MW; Li PK; Lam CW
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2004 Nov; 41(Pt 6):482-4. PubMed ID: 15588439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enzymatic assays for creatinine: time for action.
    Panteghini M
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2008; 241():84-8. PubMed ID: 18569972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Determination of creatinine in the urine as a reference value of substances excreted by the kidney].
    Bauch K; Seitz W
    Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1985 Apr; 40(7):201-5. PubMed ID: 4002760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Creatinine clearance: enzymatic vs Jaffé determinations of creatinine in plasma and urine.
    Apple F; Bandt C; Prosch A; Erlandson G; Holmstrom V; Scholen J; Googins M
    Clin Chem; 1986 Feb; 32(2):388-90. PubMed ID: 3943207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Dry chemistry method for measuring serum urea and creatinine].
    Zhong ZY; Yang LN; Luo GF
    Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 28(4):418-20. PubMed ID: 14653136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for serum creatinine and comparison with enzymatic and Jaffe methods.
    Owen LJ; Wear JE; Keevil BG
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2006 Mar; 43(Pt 2):118-23. PubMed ID: 16536913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Susceptibility of glomerular filtration rate estimations to variations in creatinine methodology: a study in older patients.
    Lamb EJ; Wood J; Stowe HJ; O'Riordan SE; Webb MC; Dalton RN
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2005 Jan; 42(Pt 1):11-8. PubMed ID: 15802027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the ID-MS traceable MDRD equation work and is it suitable for use with compensated Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine assays?
    Vickery S; Stevens PE; Dalton RN; van Lente F; Lamb EJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Sep; 21(9):2439-45. PubMed ID: 16720592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New data on the intraindividual variation of cystatin C.
    Delanaye P; Cavalier E; Depas G; Chapelle JP; Krzesinski JM
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2008; 108(4):c246-8. PubMed ID: 18391572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do enzymatic and Jaffé creatinine assays produce comparable results for pre and post dialysis specimens from patients with chronic renal failure?
    Rumbelow BD; Peake MJ; Ehrhardt V
    Clin Lab; 2000; 46(11-12):589-90. PubMed ID: 11109507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate.
    Hoek FJ; Kemperman FA; Krediet RT
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2024-31. PubMed ID: 13679476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the IRMA TRUpoint and i-STAT creatinine assays.
    Nichols JH; Bartholomew C; Bonzagi A; Garb JL; Jin L
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Feb; 377(1-2):201-5. PubMed ID: 17113060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.