These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10746521)

  • 21. State implementation of the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000: a collaborative effort among government agencies.
    French C; True S; McIntyre R; Sciulli M; Maloy KA
    Public Health Rep; 2004; 119(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 15158107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, October 31, 1991-September 30, 1993.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1994 Jul; 43(29):530-4. PubMed ID: 8028574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. American Cancer Society: Cost of screening mammography. Issues, recommendations, and solutions.
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1694-9. PubMed ID: 3651997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mandated coverage for cancer-screening services: whose guidelines do states follow?
    Rathore SS; McGreevey JD; Schulman KA; Atkins D
    Am J Prev Med; 2000 Aug; 19(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 10913895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
    Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laws requiring health plans to provide direct access to obstetricians and gynecologists, and use of cancer screening by women.
    Baker LC; Chan J
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):990-1007. PubMed ID: 17489900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008.
    Armour BS; Thierry JM; Wolf LA
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):406-14. PubMed ID: 19879454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast cancer screening legislation in the United States.
    Thompson GB; Kessler LG; Boss LP
    Am J Public Health; 1989 Nov; 79(11):1541-3. PubMed ID: 2683814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characteristics of State Policies Impact Health Care Delivery: An Analysis of Mammographic Dense Breast Notification and Insurance Legislation.
    Horný M; Shwartz M; Duszak R; Christiansen CL; Cohen AB; Burgess JF
    Med Care; 2018 Sep; 56(9):798-804. PubMed ID: 30036236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using the internet to identify women's sources of breast health education and screening.
    Thomas B; Stamler LL; Lafreniere KD; Out J; Delahunt TD
    Women Health; 2002; 36(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 12215002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010.
    Menvielle G; Richard JB; Ringa V; Dray-Spira R; Beck F
    Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 24842393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Update: National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program--July 1991-September 1995.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1996 Jun; 45(23):484-7. PubMed ID: 8628207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs.
    Greif JM
    Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 20371181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Primary Care Provider Experience with Breast Density Legislation in Massachusetts.
    Gunn CM; Kressin NR; Cooper K; Marturano C; Freund KM; Battaglia TA
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 May; 27(5):615-622. PubMed ID: 29338539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening in Spanish women with diabetes: associated factors and trend between 2006 and 2010.
    Martinez-Huedo MA; Lopez de Andres A; Hernandez-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Martinez Hernandez D; Jiménez-Garcia R
    Diabetes Metab; 2012 Apr; 38(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 22078638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast cancer legislation: a review of federal and state initiatives.
    Smith KT
    Imprint; 1997; 44(5):28, 30, 32. PubMed ID: 9407799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: a comprehensive public health response to two major health issues for women.
    Henson RM; Wyatt SW; Lee NC
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 1996; 2(2):36-47. PubMed ID: 10186667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determinants of the demand for breast cancer screening among women veterans in the United States.
    Lairson DR; Chan W; Newmark GR
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Oct; 61(7):1608-17. PubMed ID: 16005790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
    Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.