These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10746521)
41. Breast cancer screening in relation to access to health services. Facione NC Oncol Nurs Forum; 1999 May; 26(4):689-96. PubMed ID: 10337647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored. Hendrick RE; Helvie MA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W112-6. PubMed ID: 21257850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results. Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Swan J; Breen N; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Lee NC Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(6):1528-40. PubMed ID: 12627518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Dense Breast Legislation in the United States: State of the States. Dehkordy SF; Carlos RC J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R53-R57. PubMed ID: 27814815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Dense Breast Notification Laws: Impact on Downstream Imaging After Screening Mammography. HornĂ½ M; Cohen AB; Duszak R; Christiansen CL; Shwartz M; Burgess JF Med Care Res Rev; 2020 Apr; 77(2):143-154. PubMed ID: 29347864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The Impact of Breast Density Reporting Laws on Women's Awareness of Density-Associated Risks and Conversations Regarding Supplemental Screening With Providers. Cappello NM; Richetelli D; Lee CI J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Feb; 16(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 30287178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Legislative interventions to increase access to screening mammography. McKinney MM; Marconi KM J Community Health; 1992 Dec; 17(6):333-49. PubMed ID: 1293140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A Call for Fertility Preservation Coverage for Breast Cancer Patients: The Cost of Consistency. Walter JR; Xu S; Woodruff TK J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 May; 109(5):. PubMed ID: 28376233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Regulating radiology: ethical issues in mammography and federal legislation. Schonfeld Fey T J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 Dec; 9(10):1113-8. PubMed ID: 11153107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Association Between Dense Breast Legislation and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis. Shen C; Klein RW; Moss JL; Dodge DG; Chetlen AL; Stahl KA; Zhou S; Leslie DL; Ruffin MT; Lengerich EJ Am J Prev Med; 2021 Dec; 61(6):890-899. PubMed ID: 34376293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The impact of legislation mandating breast density notification - Review of the evidence. Houssami N; Lee CI Breast; 2018 Dec; 42():102-112. PubMed ID: 30236594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Breast Density Reporting Laws and Supplemental Screening-A Survey of Referring Providers' Experiences and Understanding. Maimone S; McDonough MD; Hines SL Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2017; 46(2):105-109. PubMed ID: 27289137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research. Lee CI; Bassett LW; Lehman CD Radiology; 2012 Sep; 264(3):632-6. PubMed ID: 22919037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Effectiveness of mass screening for breast cancer in Japan. Kuroishi T; Hirose K; Suzuki T; Tominaga S Breast Cancer; 2000 Jan; 7(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11029764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A disease-specific Medicaid expansion for women. The Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000. Lantz PM; Weisman CS; Itani Z Womens Health Issues; 2003; 13(3):79-92. PubMed ID: 12867087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]