106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10748444)
1. A probability prediction rule for malignant cervical lymphadenopathy using sonography.
Wu CH; Lee MM; Huang KC; Ko JY; Sheen TS; Hsieh FJ
Head Neck; 2000 May; 22(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 10748444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting malignant neck lymphadenopathy using color duplex sonography based on multivariate analysis.
Chammas MC; Macedo TA; Lo VW; Gomes AC; Juliano A; Cerri GG
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016 Nov; 44(9):587-594. PubMed ID: 27492569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Real-time and computerized sonographic scoring system for predicting malignant cervical lymphadenopathy.
Liao LJ; Wang CT; Young YH; Cheng PW
Head Neck; 2010 May; 32(5):594-8. PubMed ID: 19693943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging.
Gupta A; Rahman K; Shahid M; Kumar A; Qaseem SM; Hassan SA; Siddiqui FA
Head Neck; 2011 Mar; 33(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20652889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes: A Comparative Study With B-mode and Color Doppler Sonography.
Acu L; Oktar SÖ; Acu R; Yücel C; Cebeci S
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2491-2499. PubMed ID: 27794132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography.
Na DG; Lim HK; Byun HS; Kim HD; Ko YH; Baek JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9129432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vascular pathology of malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with power Doppler ultrasound.
Wu CH; Hsu MM; Chang YL; Hsieh FJ
Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(6):1189-96. PubMed ID: 9740085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of Doppler spectral analysis and power Doppler sonography in the differentiation of cervical lymphadenopathies.
Wu CH; Chang YL; Hsu WC; Ko JY; Sheen TS; Hsieh FJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):503-9. PubMed ID: 9694484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic findings predictive of central lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: influence of associated chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis on the diagnostic performance of sonography.
Yoo YH; Kim JA; Son EJ; Youk JH; Kwak JY; Kim EK; Park CS
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2145-51. PubMed ID: 24277897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the sonographic features of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck malignancy.
Imani Moghaddam M; Davachi B; Mostaan LV; Langaroodi AJ; Memar B; Azimi SA; Marouzi P
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2179-84. PubMed ID: 22075819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic features of cervical lymph nodes after thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Kim DW; Choo HJ; Lee YJ; Jung SJ; Eom JW; Ha TK
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1173-80. PubMed ID: 23804339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Differential diagnosis in cervical lymphadenopathies: efficacy of B-mode, color and power Doppler ultrasonography].
Ayata Z; Apaydin M; Varer M; Sarsilmaz A; Calli C; Rezanko T
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2009; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 19860630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Differentiation of abdominal lymphadenoptahy with power Doppler sonography].
Neumann-Silkow H; Görg C
Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 20084598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.
Choi MY; Lee JW; Jang KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasonographic evaluation of malignant and normal cervical lymph nodes.
Giacomini CP; Jeffrey RB; Shin LK
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2013 Jun; 34(3):236-47. PubMed ID: 23768890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes: value of B-mode and color Doppler sonography.
Adibelli ZH; Unal G; Gül E; Uslu F; Koçak U; Abali Y
Eur J Radiol; 1998 Oct; 28(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 9881258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Clinical Value of New Scoring System of Cervical Lymph Node.
Shen H; Lv G; Ke L; Li L; Zheng C; Yang S
Ultrasound Q; 2019 Sep; 35(3):269-274. PubMed ID: 30724865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography for evaluation of enlarged cervical lymph nodes in head and neck tumors.
Moritz JD; Ludwig A; Oestmann JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 May; 174(5):1279-84. PubMed ID: 10789776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
