212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10748509)
1. GM food singled out for labeling in the US.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):375. PubMed ID: 10748509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. US reforms rules for telling public about GM food.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2000 May; 405(6783):108. PubMed ID: 10821240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Science-free GM good tests advance.
Peerenboom E
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):712-3. PubMed ID: 9702761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. GM labeling in China beset by problems.
Jia H
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):835-6. PubMed ID: 12894183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Europe angers US with strict GM labeling.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12511897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US courts thwart GM alfalfa and turf grass.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 25(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 17420729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lawsuit demands labels for modified foods.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1998 Jun; 393(6684):404. PubMed ID: 9623991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The food label and the right-to-know.
Degnan FH
Food Drug Law J; 1997; 52(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 10346709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. GM grass trials blocked.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 May; 26(5):482. PubMed ID: 18464761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hygiene and standards aspects of registration, marking and labeling of food products prepared from genetically modified sources].
Onishchenko GG
Vopr Pitan; 2001; 70(2):3-7. PubMed ID: 11494669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposed rules issued for bioengineered foods.
Formanek R
FDA Consum; 2001; 35(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 11444252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. GM crop data-agronomy and ecology in tandem.
Stewart CN; Wheaton SK
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 11135511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Special labeling requirements for genetically engineered food: how sound are the analytical frameworks used by FDA and food producers?
Winn LB
Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(4):667-88. PubMed ID: 11824460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Uninformation and the choice paradox.
McHughen A
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Oct; 18(10):1018-9. PubMed ID: 11016993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US, EU prepare for further biotech food dispute.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):897. PubMed ID: 11581641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. No "killer tomatoes": easing federal regulation of genetically engineered plants.
Beach JE
Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 11795332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Liabilities and economics of transgenic crops.
Smyth S; Khachatourians GG; Phillips PW
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 12042844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
