These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10749055)

  • 1. Three-dimensional Bolton-Brush Growth Study landmark data: ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of the Bolton standards cohort.
    Dean D; Hans MG; Bookstein FL; Subramanyan K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Mar; 37(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 10749055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthognathic surgery outcome analysis: 3-dimensional landmark geometric morphometrics.
    Cakirer B; Dean D; Palomo JM; Hans MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(2):116-32. PubMed ID: 12099316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphometric evaluation of soft-tissue profile shape.
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17418714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Allometries throughout the late prenatal and early postnatal human craniofacial ontogeny.
    Sardi ML; Ventrice F; Ramírez Rozzi F
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2007 Sep; 290(9):1112-20. PubMed ID: 17721983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population.
    Bulygina E; Mitteroecker P; Aiello L
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Nov; 131(3):432-43. PubMed ID: 16596605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth.
    Ursi WJ; Trotman CA; McNamara JA; Behrents RG
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 8507031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Geometric morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth between the ages of 12 and 14 in normal humans.
    Katsadouris A; Halazonetis DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 27940444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fourier analysis of cephalometric shapes.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; D'Addona A; Taroni A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 May; 33(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 8734720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A longitudinal 3-dimensional size and shape comparison of untreated Class I and Class II subjects.
    Palomo JM; Hunt DW; Hans MG; Broadbent BH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):584-91. PubMed ID: 15877039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual dimorphism in the baboon facial skeleton.
    Leigh SR; Cheverud JM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Feb; 84(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 2021194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ontogenetic allometry and cranial shape diversification among human populations from South America.
    Gonzalez PN; Perez SI; Bernal V
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2011 Nov; 294(11):1864-74. PubMed ID: 21957064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A size-standardized analysis of soft tissue facial profile during growth.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Pizzini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 9228838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation.
    Mellion ZJ; Behrents RG; Johnston LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):845-54. PubMed ID: 23726335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.
    Lux CJ; Starke J; Rübel J; Stellzig A; Komposch G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 12019012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Landmark identification error in submentovertex cephalometrics. A computerized method for determining the condylar long axis.
    Williamson PC; Major PW; Nebbe B; Glover KE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Sep; 86(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 9768429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Growth Patterns and Individual Variation in Mid-sagittal Facial Soft Tissue Depth from Childhood to Adulthood.
    McKinnon MR; Simpson EK; Henneberg M
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1641-1651. PubMed ID: 29495065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardization of 3-D CT measurements for length and angles by matrix transformation in the 3-D coordinate system.
    Kitaura H; Yonetsu K; Kitamori H; Kobayashi K; Nakamura T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Jul; 37(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 10912713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterizing mandibular growth using three-dimensional imaging techniques and anatomic landmarks.
    Kelly MP; Vorperian HK; Wang Y; Tillman KK; Werner HM; Chung MK; Gentry LR
    Arch Oral Biol; 2017 May; 77():27-38. PubMed ID: 28161602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.