BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10749226)

  • 1. Comparison of sonographic and CT guidance techniques: does CT fluoroscopy decrease procedure time?
    Sheafor DH; Paulson EK; Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Apr; 174(4):939-42. PubMed ID: 10749226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT fluoroscopy guidance.
    Daly B; Krebs TL; Wong-You-Cheong JJ; Wang SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 10470894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of sonography as a guidance technique for biopsy of abdominal, pelvic, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes.
    Memel DS; Dodd GD; Esola CC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Oct; 167(4):957-62. PubMed ID: 8819394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure.
    Silverman SG; Tuncali K; Adams DF; Nawfel RD; Zou KH; Judy PF
    Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):673-81. PubMed ID: 10478231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of needle guidance devices for their potential to reduce fluoroscopy time and operator hand dose during C-arm cone-beam computed tomography-guided needle interventions.
    Kroes MW; Busser WM; Fütterer JJ; Arntz MJ; Janssen CM; Hoogeveen YL; de Lange F; Schultze Kool LJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):901-6. PubMed ID: 23602061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Percutaneous abdominopelvic interventional procedures using real-time CT fluoroscopy guidance at 21 mAs: an analysis of 99 consecutive cases].
    Soyer P; Fargeaudou Y; Boudiaf M; Hamzi L; Rymer R
    J Radiol; 2008 May; 89(5 Pt 1):565-70. PubMed ID: 18535497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percutaneous biopsy of thoracic lesions: value of sonography for needle guidance.
    Ikezoe J; Morimoto S; Arisawa J; Takashima S; Kozuka T; Nakahara K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Jun; 154(6):1181-5. PubMed ID: 2110724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sonography: the undiscovered jewel of interventional radiology.
    Dodd GD; Esola CC; Memel DS; Ghiatas AA; Chintapalli KN; Paulson EK; Nelson RC; Ferris JV; Baron RL
    Radiographics; 1996 Nov; 16(6):1271-88. PubMed ID: 8946535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Needle-tip localization during CT-guided abdominal biopsy: comparison of conventional and spiral CT.
    Silverman SG; Bloom DA; Seltzer SE; Tempany CM; Adams DF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Nov; 159(5):1095-7. PubMed ID: 1414782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abdominal percutaneous interventional procedures: comparison of CT and US guidance.
    Sheafor DH; Paulson EK; Simmons CM; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
    Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):705-10. PubMed ID: 9609893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: comparison of CT and endoscopic sonography guidance.
    Erturk SM; Mortelé KJ; Tuncali K; Saltzman JR; Lao R; Silverman SG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1531-5. PubMed ID: 17114547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility study of needle placement in percutaneous vertebroplasty: cone-beam computed tomography guidance versus conventional fluoroscopy.
    Braak SJ; Zuurmond K; Aerts HC; van Leersum M; Overtoom TT; van Heesewijk JP; van Strijen MJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23511990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Control of percutaneous biopsy with CT fluoroscopy].
    Froelich JJ; Ishaque N; Saar B; Regn J; Walthers EM; Mauermann F; Klose KJ
    Rofo; 1999 Feb; 170(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 10101361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CT fluoroscopy-assisted needle puncture and ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary study.
    Takayasu K; Muramatsu Y; Asai S; Muramatsu Y; Kobayashi T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1219-24. PubMed ID: 10541092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small lymph nodes of the abdomen, pelvis, and retroperitoneum: usefulness of sonographically guided biopsy.
    Fisher AJ; Paulson EK; Sheafor DH; Simmons CM; Nelson RC
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):185-90. PubMed ID: 9314983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sonographically guided biopsy of focal lesions: a comparison of freehand and probe-guided techniques using a phantom.
    Phal PM; Brooks DM; Wolfe R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1652-6. PubMed ID: 15855133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Use of Laser Guidance Reduces Fluoroscopy Time for C-Arm Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Biopsies.
    Kroes MW; van Strijen MJ; Braak SJ; Hoogeveen YL; de Lange F; Schultze Kool LJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2016 Sep; 39(9):1322-6. PubMed ID: 27094692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of CT biopsy: laser guidance versus conventional freehand techniques.
    Pereles FS; Baker M; Baldwin R; Krupinski E; Unger EC
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Nov; 5(11):766-70. PubMed ID: 9809074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Needle biopsy of anatomically unfavorable liver lesions with an electromagnetic navigation assist device in a computed tomography environment.
    Banovac F; Wilson E; Zhang H; Cleary K
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Oct; 17(10):1671-5. PubMed ID: 17057009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Challenges in abdominal/pelvic biopsy techniques.
    McGahan JP
    Abdom Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(5):1043-56. PubMed ID: 23748353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.