These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

24 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10749521)

  • 1. Minimum reporting standards about dosimetry of radiation sources used in radiation research studies.
    Wojcik A; Thierry-Chef I; Friedl AA; Rühm W
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2024 May; 63(2):181-183. PubMed ID: 38376815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods to Track Effective Doses from Airborne Radioactive Emissions for Compliance with 40 CFR 61, SUBPART H.
    Harshman AM; McCarter WL
    Health Phys; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39051999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linear vs. function-based dose algorithm designs.
    Stanford N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):253-6. PubMed ID: 21199827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A survey of physical dosimetry to date and in the near future: Part 1. Review of standards and regulatory issues.
    Cassata JR
    Mil Med; 2002 Feb; 167(2 Suppl):30-2. PubMed ID: 11873507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of a study to determine the impact of the new dosimetry performance standard, N13.11-2001.
    Cummings R
    Health Phys; 2003 Mar; 84(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 12645764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishment of ANSI N13.11 X-ray radiation fields for personal dosimetry performance test by computation and experiment.
    Kim JL; Kim BH; Chang SY; Lee JK
    Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Dec; 105 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1417-21. PubMed ID: 9467054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two methods for examining angular response of personnel dosimeters.
    Plato P; Leib R; Miklos J
    Health Phys; 1988 Jun; 54(6):597-606. PubMed ID: 3378893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental dosimetry performance criteria: pilot test of proposed ANSI draft standard N13.29. American National Standards Institute.
    Klemic GA; Shobe J; Sengupta S
    Health Phys; 2000 Apr; 78(4):370-6. PubMed ID: 10749521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnostic kits in parasitology: which controls?].
    Rossi P
    Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):145-9. PubMed ID: 15305705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose assessment in environmental radiological protection: State of the art and perspectives.
    Stark K; Goméz-Ros JM; Vives I Batlle J; Lindbo Hansen E; Beaugelin-Seiller K; Kapustka LA; Wood MD; Bradshaw C; Real A; McGuire C; Hinton TG
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 Sep; 175-176():105-114. PubMed ID: 28505478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anniversary paper: fifty years of AAPM involvement in radiation dosimetry.
    Ibbott G; Ma CM; Rogers DW; Seltzer SM; Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1418-27. PubMed ID: 18491537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT.
    Low DA; Moran JM; Dempsey JF; Dong L; Oldham M
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1313-38. PubMed ID: 21520843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.