BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10750232)

  • 1. Chlamydia trachomatis in primary care: knowledge and practice in Glasgow.
    Kinn S; Macnaughton J; Noone A; Scoular A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Mar; 50(452):214-5. PubMed ID: 10750232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of the impact of a national health demonstration project on testing and management for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in two regions of Scotland.
    Penney GC; Brace V; Cameron S; Tucker J
    Public Health; 2005 Nov; 119(11):1031-8. PubMed ID: 16084540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Managing genital chlamydia trachomatis infection in Scotland: targeted opportunistic testing or a screening programme?
    Clutterbuck DJ
    Health Bull (Edinb); 2001 Nov; 59(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 12661390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chlamydia trachomatis: opportunistic screening in primary care.
    Santer M; Wyke S
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Nov; 51(472):931. PubMed ID: 11761212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
    Norman JE; Wu O; Twaddle S; Macmillan S; McMillan L; Templeton A; McKenzie H; Noone A; Allardice G; Reid M
    BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chlamydia screening in primary care.
    Macleod J; Salisbury C; Egger M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Jun; 50(455):502-3. PubMed ID: 10962797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chlamydia trachomatis: opportunistic screening in primary care.
    Furber AS
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Sep; 51(470):757. PubMed ID: 11593849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.
    Senok A; Wilson P; Reid M; Scoular A; Craig N; McConnachie A; Fitzpatrick B; MacDonald A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Mar; 59(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15709078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening for chlamydia in general practice.
    Heal C; Jones B; Veitch C; Lamb S; Hodgens S; Browning S; Butler H; Carey M
    Aust Fam Physician; 2002 Aug; 31(8):779-82. PubMed ID: 12189675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Young, male, and infected: the forgotten victims of chlamydia in primary care.
    Robertson P; Williams OE
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 15681719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of the general practitioner in testing for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: an analysis of enhanced surveillance data.
    Shaw K; Stephens N; Coleman D; O'Sullivan M
    Sex Health; 2009 Sep; 6(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 19653957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for chlamydia trachomatis: barriers for homeless young people.
    Henning D; Alice R; Sanci L; Dunning T
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2007; 24(3):8-13. PubMed ID: 17518159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An audit of Chlamydia trachomatis screening in colposcopy--Hartlepool experience.
    Tayal SC; Robertson A; Doxford L
    Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Jul; 16(7):500-1. PubMed ID: 16004631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling the impact of opportunistic screening on the sequelae and public healthcare costs of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Australian women.
    Ward B; Rodger AJ; Jackson TJ
    Public Health; 2006 Jan; 120(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16271271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Broer J; Hoebe CJ; Steyerberg EW; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15681717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-infection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients presenting to the genitourinary medicine clinic in Portsmouth: the chlamydia screening pilot study - three years on.
    Lee VF; Tobin JM; Harindra V
    Int J STD AIDS; 2004 Nov; 15(11):744-6. PubMed ID: 15537461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chlamydia detection and management.
    Dayan L
    Aust Fam Physician; 2000 Jun; 29(6):522-6. PubMed ID: 10863806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young men attending an emergency department.
    Sood T; Sally D; Spencer N; Banerjee A; Hinchley G
    Emerg Med J; 2008 Jul; 25(7):428-30. PubMed ID: 18573958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized trial of strategies to increase chlamydia screening in young women.
    Scholes D; Grothaus L; McClure J; Reid R; Fishman P; Sisk C; Lindenbaum JE; Green B; Grafton J; Thompson RS
    Prev Med; 2006 Oct; 43(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 16782182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opportunistic screening of young men for urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in general practice.
    Andersen B; Eidner PO; Hagensen D; Lomborg S; Hoff G
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2005; 37(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 15764188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.