These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10750232)

  • 21. Risk selection and targeted interventions in community-based control of chlamydia.
    Richardus JH; Götz HM
    Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2007 Feb; 20(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 17197883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implementing a Chlamydia pilot screening programme.
    Gleave T
    Nurs Times; 2002 Dec 10-16; 98(50):34-7. PubMed ID: 12518550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Chlamydia screening programme, HMP Hydebank Wood Young Offender Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
    Hirst H; Dinsmore WW
    Int J STD AIDS; 2009 May; 20(5):360-1. PubMed ID: 19386977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Is screening for Chlamydia Trachomatis infection in all sexually active adolescent females appropriate?].
    Anjot MN; Alvin P
    Arch Pediatr; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1773-4. PubMed ID: 16253489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance of a screening algorithm for chlamydial infection in 2 samples of patients in general practice.
    Verhoeven V; Avonts D; Van Royen P; Weyler J; Wang X; Stalpaert M
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2004; 36(11-12):873-5. PubMed ID: 15764176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Screening for pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic men who have sex with men.
    Coughlan E; Young S
    N Z Med J; 2006 Apr; 119(1232):U1948. PubMed ID: 16633402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Follow-up, treatment, and reinfection rates among asymptomatic chlamydia trachomatis cases in general practice.
    van Valkengoed IG; Morré SA; van den Brule AJ; Meijer CJ; Bouter LM; van Eijk JT; Boeke AJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 2002 Aug; 52(481):623-7. PubMed ID: 12171219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening male prisoners for Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on test positivity among women from their neighborhoods who were tested in family planning clinics.
    Peterman TA; Newman DR; Goldberg M; Anschuetz GL; Salmon M; Satterwhite CL; Berman SM
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Jul; 36(7):425-9. PubMed ID: 19525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Chlamydia trachomatis infections--a time for action?].
    Mylonas I; Kirschner W; Weissenbacher T; Gingelmaier A; Weissenbacher ER; Friese K
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2007 May; 132(21):1170-6. PubMed ID: 17506013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in small rural town family planning clinics in the central belt of Scotland.
    Sudlow E; Court S; Smith C
    Health Bull (Edinb); 2001 Sep; 59(5):332-4. PubMed ID: 12664747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chlamydia trachomatis detection in cervical PreservCyt specimens from an Irish urban female population.
    Keegan H; Ryan F; Malkin A; Griffin M; Lambkin H
    Cytopathology; 2009 Apr; 20(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 18093220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chlamydia trachomatis: time for screening?
    Spiliopoulou A; Lakiotis V; Vittoraki A; Zavou D; Mauri D
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2005 Sep; 11(9):687-9. PubMed ID: 16104982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors influencing women's views on the acceptability and experience of being opportunistically screened for Chlamydia trachomatis in hospital settings.
    McMillan LE; Norman JE; Murray K; Reid ME
    Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Dec; 17(12):821-5. PubMed ID: 17212859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. General practice funding to improve provision of adolescent primary sexual health care in New Zealand: results from an observational intervention.
    Morgan J; Haar J
    Sex Health; 2009 Sep; 6(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 19653956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Commentary: Chlamydia trachomatis screening: what are we trying to do?
    Peterman TA; Gottlieb SL; Berman SM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 38(2):449-51. PubMed ID: 19174542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Rasmussen KL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Jul; 158(27):3952. PubMed ID: 8701515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chlamydia screening in general practice: views of professionals on the key elements of a successful programme.
    Ma R; Clarke A
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Oct; 31(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 16274554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Chlamydia screening would pay dividends.
    Robinson A
    Practitioner; 1998 Oct; 242(1591):667. PubMed ID: 10343443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of the recommendations of a British advisory group for screening for chlamydia in a sample of women in general practice.
    Verhoeven V; Avonts D; Meheus A; Ieven M; Goossens H; Van Royen P
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 12790310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical guidelines in primary care: a survey of general practitioners' attitudes and behaviour.
    Hay S; Oakeshott P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Oct; 46(411):626. PubMed ID: 8945807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.