These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10751499)

  • 1. Positron emission mammographic instrument: initial results.
    Murthy K; Aznar M; Bergman AM; Thompson CJ; Robar JL; Lisbona R; Loutfi A; Gagnon JH
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 10751499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG.
    Murthy K; Aznar M; Thompson CJ; Loutfi A; Lisbona R; Gagnon JH
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Nov; 41(11):1851-8. PubMed ID: 11079494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Background ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in positron emission mammography (PEM): correlation with mammographic density and background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI.
    Koo HR; Moon WK; Chun IK; Eo JS; Jeyanth JX; Chang JM; Cho N; Kang KW
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1738-42. PubMed ID: 23806533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positron Emission Mammography Image Interpretation for Reduced Image Count Levels.
    MacDonald LR; Hippe DS; Bender LC; Cotter EW; Voria PR; Hallam PS; Wang CL; Haseley DR; Kelly MM; Parikh JR; Beatty JD; Rogers JV
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Mar; 57(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 26635337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary results for positron emission mammography: real-time functional breast imaging in a conventional mammography gantry.
    Weinberg I; Majewski S; Weisenberger A; Markowitz A; Aloj L; Majewski L; Danforth D; Mulshine J; Cowan K; Zujewski J; Chow C; Jones E; Chang V; Berg W; Frank J
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1996 Jul; 23(7):804-6. PubMed ID: 8662120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. List-mode maximum-likelihood reconstruction applied to positron emission mammography (PEM) with irregular sampling.
    Huesman RH; Klein GJ; Moses WW; Qi J; Reutter BW; Virador PR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 May; 19(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 11021696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clear-PEM: a dedicated PET camera for improved breast cancer detection.
    Abreu MC; Almeida P; Balau F; Ferreira NC; Fetal S; Fraga F; Martins M; Matela N; Moura R; Ortigão C; Peralta L; Rato P; Ribeiro R; Rodrigues P; Santos AI; Trindade A; Varela J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):208-10. PubMed ID: 16604628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography, sestamibi breast scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography breast imaging.
    Pisano ED; Parham CA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):861-9, x. PubMed ID: 10943283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The potential role of positron emission mammography for detection of breast cancer. A phantom study.
    Raylman RR; Majewski S; Wojcik R; Weisenberger AG; Kross B; Popov V; Bishop HA
    Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1943-54. PubMed ID: 10984240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FDG imaging of lung nodules: a phantom study comparing SPECT, camera-based PET, and dedicated PET.
    Coleman RE; Laymon CM; Turkington TG
    Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):823-8. PubMed ID: 10207487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nuclear imaging in breast cancer.
    Ferrara A
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 20051596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility study for positron emission mammography.
    Thompson CJ; Murthy K; Weinberg IN; Mako F
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 8058019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the performance of a whole-body positron imaging system with attenuation correction.
    Ota T; Ito K; Tadokoro M; Kato T; Nishino M; Amano M; Ishigaki T
    Radiat Med; 1995; 13(3):121-8. PubMed ID: 7569003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential.
    Adler DD; Wahl RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 7998538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of Compton background and breast compression on cancer detection in scintimammography.
    Pani R; Scopinaro F; Pellegrini R; Soluri A; Weinberg IN; De Vincentis G
    Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(3B):1645-9. PubMed ID: 9179211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of advanced iterative reconstruction methods for SPECT/CT.
    Knoll P; Kotalova D; Köchle G; Kuzelka I; Minear G; Mirzaei S; Sámal M; Zadrazil L; Bergmann H
    Z Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 21723716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image improvement method for positron emission mammography.
    Slavine NV; Seiler SJ; McColl RW; Lenkinski RE
    Phys Med; 2017 Jul; 39():164-173. PubMed ID: 28688583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technique to obtain positron emission mammography images in registration with x-ray mammograms.
    Bergman AM; Thompson CJ; Murthy K; Robar JL; Clancy RL; English MJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Nov; 25(11):2119-29. PubMed ID: 9829236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera.
    Surti S; Karp JS
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Jun; 45(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15181139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limited angle, limited approach?
    van Rijk PP; van Dongen AJ
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Nov; 41(11):1859-60. PubMed ID: 11079495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.