252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10751863)
1. Patients with abnormal ultrasound of the prostate but normal digital rectal examination should be classified as having clinical stage T2 tumors.
Tiguert R; Gheiler EL; Grignon DJ; Littrup PJ; Sakr W; Pontes JE; Wood DP
J Urol; 2000 May; 163(5):1486-90. PubMed ID: 10751863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen.
Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial.
Smith JA; Scardino PT; Resnick MI; Hernandez AD; Rose SC; Egger MJ
J Urol; 1997 Mar; 157(3):902-6. PubMed ID: 9072596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal 14-core systematic biopsy detects apico-anterior cancer foci of T1c prostate cancer.
Kawakami S; Kihara K; Fujii Y; Masuda H; Kobayashi T; Kageyama Y
Int J Urol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 15285751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of visible lesions on transrectal ultrasound in impalpable prostate cancers: implications for staging.
Augustin H; Graefen M; Palisaar J; Blonski J; Erbersdobler A; Daghofer F; Huland H; Hammerer PG
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Aug; 21(15):2860-8. PubMed ID: 12885802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density in the detection of nonpalpable and stage T1C carcinoma of the prostate.
Presti JC; Hovey R; Carroll PR; Shinohara K
J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1685-90. PubMed ID: 8863571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
McSherry SA; Levy F; Schiebler ML; Keefe B; Dent GA; Mohler JL
J Urol; 1991 Jul; 146(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 1711590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transrectal ultrasound, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen: preliminary results of an early detection program for prostate cancer.
Lee F; McHugh TA; Solomon MH; Dorr RP; Siders DB; Kirscht JL; Christensen LL; Mitchell A
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1991; 137():101-5. PubMed ID: 1719616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Staging prostate cancer--1997: current methods and limitations.
Bostwick DG
Eur Urol; 1997; 32 Suppl 3():2-14. PubMed ID: 9267781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The digital rectal exam, prostate-specific antigen and transrectal echography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer].
Martínez de Hurtado J; Chéchile Toniolo G; Villavicencio Mavrich H
Arch Esp Urol; 1995 Apr; 48(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7538749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effectiveness of transrectal ultrasonography in local staging of prostatic cancer].
Herranz Amo F; Díez Cordero JM; Verdú Tartajo F; Lledo García E; Jara Rascón J; González Chamorro F; Rodríguez Fernández E
Actas Urol Esp; 1997 Jun; 21(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 9412192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate carcinoma patients upstaged by imaging and treated with irradiation. An outcome-based analysis.
Pinover WH; Hanlon A; Lee WR; Kaplan EJ; Hanks GE
Cancer; 1996 Apr; 77(7):1334-41. PubMed ID: 8608512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Roberts SG; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Zincke H
Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 11393495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative prediction of tumor heterogeneity and recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostatic carcinoma with digital rectal, examination prostate specific antigen and the results of 6 systematic biopsies.
Huland H; Hammerer P; Henke RP; Huland E
J Urol; 1996 Apr; 155(4):1344-7. PubMed ID: 8632570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging-directed transrectal ultrasound biopsy increases prostate cancer detection in men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination.
Javali TD; Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Jagannathan NR; Thulkar S; Dinda AK
Int J Urol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23980749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The New American Joint Committee on Cancer and International Union Against Cancer TNM classification of prostate cancer. Clinicopathologic correlations.
Ohori M; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 7516262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Predictive value of prostate specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels and normal digital rectal findings or stage A prostate cancer].
Iwaki H; Kajita Y; Shimizu Y; Yamauchi T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2001 Mar; 47(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 11329957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The risks of prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound guide biopsy in Thai men with abnormal prostatic-specific antigen or abnormal digital rectal examination.
Leewansangtong S; Tantiwong A; Ratanarapee S; Nualyong C; Soontrapa S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Dec; 83(12):1519-24. PubMed ID: 11253893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do impalpable stage T1c prostate cancers visible on ultrasound differ from those not visible?
Ohori M; Kattan MW; Utsunomiya T; Suyama K; Scardino PT; Wheeler TM
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):964-8. PubMed ID: 12576823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inaccuracies in assignment of clinical stage for localized prostate cancer.
Reese AC; Sadetsky N; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Cancer; 2011 Jan; 117(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 21210472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
