These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10752390)
1. Cuspal fracture with conventional Class II amalgam. Davis MW Dent Today; 1998 Dec; 17(12):42-4, 46-9. PubMed ID: 10752390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations. Cötert HS; Sen BH; Balkan M Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 11508095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture strength of premolars with Class 2 silver amalgam restorations. el-Sherif MH; Halhoul MN; Kamar AA; Nour el-Din A Oper Dent; 1988; 13(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 3270038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations. Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness. Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance. Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam. el-Badrawy WA Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantages and procedures using air abrasion. Ross G Ont Dent; 1998 Mar; 75(2):36-9, 41-2. PubMed ID: 9656915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. On material choice and fracture susceptibility of restored teeth: an asymptotic stress analysis approach. Kahler B; Kotousov A; Melkoumian N Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1109-14. PubMed ID: 16375962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with the bonded amalgam technique. Dias de Souza GM; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Paulillo LA Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 11551017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of lower molars with Class 1 composite and amalgam restorations. Watts DC; el Mowafy OM; Grant AA Dent Mater; 1987 Oct; 3(5):261-4. PubMed ID: 3479363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam. Wahl MJ Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):525-35. PubMed ID: 11495565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations: a challenge for the profession. Klausner LH; Green TG; Charbeneau GT Oper Dent; 1987; 12(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 3476910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. Rees JS Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Dec; 106(6):1028-32. PubMed ID: 9879915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Isthmus fracture of amalgam restorations]. Heller EJ; Penning C; Thoden van Velzen SK Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1985 Sep; 92(9):320-2. PubMed ID: 3866970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]