These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10752390)

  • 21. Computer simulation on creep of amalgam in Class I cavity.
    Asaoka K; Kawano F
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1992; 2(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 1458203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Chipping and cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam. Clinical studies and a few reflections on this problem].
    Malmström C
    Tidsskr Tandlaeger; 1986 Apr; 6(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 3462961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Physical properties of amalgam].
    Vrijhoef MM
    Rev Belge Med Dent; 1978; 33(4):329-42. PubMed ID: 291075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cuspal flexure associated with amalgam restorations.
    Assif D; Marshak BL; Pilo R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 2308086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effects of dental cements on the stress distribution in amalgam-restored teeth].
    Zhao SL; Zhang SF; Li Y; Liu H; Wang MQ
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 May; 23(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 12754135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fracture resistance of wide-isthmus mesio-occlusodistal preparations with and without amalgam cuspal coverage.
    Reagan SE; Schwandt NW; Duncanson MG
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Jul; 20(7):469-72. PubMed ID: 2626535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cusp fracture of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Teeth restored in Denmark before 1975 versus after 1979.
    Hansen EK; Asmussen E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1993 Apr; 51(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 8498164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fracture resistance of reattached incisor fragments with mini fibre-reinforced composite anchors.
    Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Wolke JG; Fokkinga WA; Machado C; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 19339099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frequency of amalgam replacement in general dental practice.
    Boyd MA; Richardson AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1985 Oct; 51(10):763-6. PubMed ID: 3904947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture resistance of premolars with bonded class II amalgams.
    Dias de Souza GM; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 12120771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis.
    Pierrisnard L; Bohin F; Renault P; Barquins M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 12447223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Composite resin restorations of permanent incisors with crown fractures.
    Oliveira GM; Ritter AV
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 19455927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fracture resistance of mandibular molars with occlusal class I amalgam preparations.
    Re GJ; Draheim RN; Norling BK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1981 Oct; 103(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 6945342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adhesive reattachment of a tooth fragment: the biological restoration.
    Terry DA
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 15(5):403-9; quiz 410. PubMed ID: 12901070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Faults and failures of restorations].
    Cuartas ME
    Acta Clin Odontol; 1981 Nov; 4(8):21-6. PubMed ID: 6949420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Re-inforcement of amalgam. 1: Effect of pin orientation, type, and number on the tensile strength of amalgam.
    el-Bahloul AN
    Egypt Dent J; 1977 Apr; 23(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 271565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
    Sagsen B; Aslan B
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.