These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10752408)

  • 1. Conservative tooth-colored restorations for the 21st century.
    Ritter RG
    Dent Today; 1998 Aug; 17(8):50-2, 54-5. PubMed ID: 10752408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Esthetic inlays and onlays.
    Jackson RD
    Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1994; ():30-9. PubMed ID: 8032438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Esthetic alternatives for posterior teeth: porcelain and laboratory-processed composite resins.
    Walton JN
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Oct; 58(10):820-3. PubMed ID: 1393795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing form, function, and natural aesthetics with laboratory-processed composite resin--Part I.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF; Maragos C
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 17(5):313-8; quiz 320. PubMed ID: 16121747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Materials for conservative posterior restorations.
    Donovan TE; Cho GC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):32-8. PubMed ID: 9120610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of aesthetic posterior restorations.
    Trushkowsky RD
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 3(6):33-9. PubMed ID: 1813043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin.
    Schulte AG; Vöckler A; Reinhardt R
    J Dent; 2005 May; 33(5):433-42. PubMed ID: 15833400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aesthetic inlays and onlays: a clinical technique update.
    Jackson RD
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 5(3):18-27; quiz 27. PubMed ID: 8593358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
    Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
    Krämer N; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conservative restoration of posterior teeth: an introspective.
    Lowe RA
    Dent Today; 2001 Jan; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 12524886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
    de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bonded restorations for the prevention and treatment of the cracked-tooth syndrome.
    Geurtsen W; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 10850244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.