These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10755285)

  • 1. Further evidence that negative priming in the Stroop color-word task is equivalent in older and younger adults.
    Little DM; Hartley AA
    Psychol Aging; 2000 Mar; 15(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 10755285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-related equivalence of identity suppression in the Stroop color-word task.
    Kieley JM; Hartley AA
    Psychol Aging; 1997 Mar; 12(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 9100265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming].
    Martin S; Brouillet D; Guerdoux E; Tarrago R
    Encephale; 2006; 32(2 Pt 1):253-62. PubMed ID: 16910627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stroop interference and negative priming: problems with inferences from null results.
    Marí-Beffa P; Estévez AF; Danziger S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):499-503. PubMed ID: 11082856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Color- and picture-word Stroop tests: performance changes in old age.
    Graf P; Uttl B; Tuokko H
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 May; 17(3):390-415. PubMed ID: 7650102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stroop interference and negative priming (NP) suppression in normal aging.
    Mayas J; Fuentes LJ; Ballesteros S
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2012; 54(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 21215468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stroop interference and negative priming in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Vitkovitch M; Bishop S; Dancey C; Richards A
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1570-6. PubMed ID: 11985838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of increased response dominance and contextual disintegration on the Stroop interference effect in older adults.
    West R; Baylis GC
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Jun; 13(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 9640582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age differences in Stroop interference: contributions of general slowing and task-specific deficits.
    Bugg JM; DeLosh EL; Davalos DB; Davis HP
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 Mar; 14(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 17364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for intact selective attention in Alzheimer's disease patients using a location priming task.
    Ko PC; Kilduff PT; Higgens JA; Milberg W; McGlinchey R
    Neuropsychology; 2005 May; 19(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 15910124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: support for selection-feature mismatch.
    MacDonald PA; Joordens S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1478-96. PubMed ID: 10946726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age differences in stroop interference in working memory.
    McCabe DP; Robertson CL; Smith AD
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Jul; 27(5):633-44. PubMed ID: 16019640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Continued inhibitory capacity throughout adulthood: conceptual negative priming in younger and older adults.
    Schooler C; Neumann E; Caplan LJ; Roberts BR
    Psychol Aging; 1997 Dec; 12(4):667-74. PubMed ID: 9416634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loss of attentional inhibition in older adults--Does it really exist? An experimental dissociation of inhibitory and memory retrieval processes.
    Giesen C; Eberhard M; Rothermund K
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Jun; 30(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 25961880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conceptual processing of distractors by older but not younger adults.
    Amer T; Hasher L
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2252-8. PubMed ID: 25376192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of attention switching on encoding and retrieval of words in younger and older adults.
    Hogan MJ; Kelly CA; Craik FI
    Exp Aging Res; 2006; 32(2):153-83. PubMed ID: 16531359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Priming and interference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: new evidence in favor of the automaticity of word recognition.
    Catena A; Fuentes LJ; Tudela P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Mar; 9(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 12026942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aging and negative priming: is ignored information inhibited or remembered?
    Pesta BJ; Sanders RE
    Exp Aging Res; 2000; 26(1):37-56. PubMed ID: 10689555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interference as measured by the Stroop Color-Word Test and the Direction-Word Test with varied comparison stimuli.
    Cannon BJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 1):1019-24. PubMed ID: 9656302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.