These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10755444)

  • 1. The fixation of the cemented femoral component. Effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness and roughness of the cement-bone surface.
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Leyvraz PF
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Mar; 82(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 10755444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cement-mantle thickness affects cement strains in total hip replacement.
    Fisher DA; Tsang AC; Paydar N; Milionis S; Turner CH
    J Biomech; 1997; 30(11-12):1173-7. PubMed ID: 9456387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Wright TM; Burstein AH
    J Biomech; 1995 Sep; 28(9):1067-78. PubMed ID: 7559676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Axisymmetric finite element analysis of a debonded total hip stem with an unsupported distal tip.
    Norman TL; Saligrama VC; Hustosky KT; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 8872263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Silicate coating of cemented titanium-based shafts in hip prosthetics reduces high aseptic loosening].
    Marx R; Faramarzi R; Jungwirth F; Kleffner BV; Mumme T; Weber M; Wirtz DC
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 19358071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants.
    Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2001 Dec; 123(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11783734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component.
    Estok DM; Orr TE; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jan; 12(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 9021500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding.
    Verdonschot N; Tanck E; Huiskes R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Dec; 42(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 9827679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-vitro characteristics of cemented titanium femoral stems with a smooth surface finish.
    Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Kaneuji A; Matsumoto T; Nakamura T
    J Orthop Sci; 2013 Jan; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22945910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femoral component loosening in hip arthroplasty. Cadaver study of subsidence and hoop strain.
    Manley MT; Stern LS; Kotzar G; Stulberg BN
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1987 Oct; 58(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 3425274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro assessment of Function Graded (FG) artificial Hip joint stem in terms of bone/cement stresses: 3D Finite Element (FE) study.
    Al-Jassir FF; Fouad H; Alothman OY
    Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Jan; 12():5. PubMed ID: 23324627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling debonded stem-cement interface for hip implants: effect of residual stresses.
    Nuño N; Amabili M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Jan; 17(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11779645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The skeletal response to matt and polished cemented femoral stems.
    Barker DS; Wang AW; Yeo MF; Nawana NS; Brumby SA; Pearcy MJ; Howie DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Nov; 82(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 11132284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suboptimal (thin) distal cement mantle thickness as a contributory factor in total hip arthroplasty femoral component failure. A retrospective radiographic analysis favoring distal stem centralization.
    Star MJ; Colwell CW; Kelman GJ; Ballock RT; Walker RH
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Apr; 9(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 8014645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals.
    Maloney WJ; Schmalzried T; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Dec; (405):70-8. PubMed ID: 12461358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Residual stresses at the stem-cement interface of an idealized cemented hip stem.
    Nuño N; Avanzolini G
    J Biomech; 2002 Jun; 35(6):849-52. PubMed ID: 12021006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.