These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10755657)

  • 1. Trunk muscle activation and low back loading in lifting in the absence of load knowledge.
    de Looze MP; Boeken-Kruger MC; Steenhuizen S; Baten CT; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2000 Mar; 43(3):333-44. PubMed ID: 10755657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement on trunk loading in lifting.
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):764-70. PubMed ID: 12698118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Load knowledge affects low-back loading and control of balance in lifting tasks.
    Commissaris DA; Toussaint HM
    Ergonomics; 1997 May; 40(5):559-75. PubMed ID: 9149555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of instruction, surface stability, and load intensity on trunk muscle activity.
    Bressel E; Willardson JM; Thompson B; Fontana FE
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Dec; 19(6):e500-4. PubMed ID: 19054687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in trunk muscle activation and lumbar-pelvic position associated with abdominal hollowing and reach during a simulated manual material handling task.
    Butler HL; Hubley-Kozey CL; Kozey JW
    Ergonomics; 2007 Mar; 50(3):410-25. PubMed ID: 17536777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.
    Shin G; Mirka G
    Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can low back loading during lifting be reduced by placing one leg beside the object to be lifted?
    Kingma I; Faber GS; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
    Phys Ther; 2006 Aug; 86(8):1091-105. PubMed ID: 16879043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting.
    Abdoli-E M; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 18093709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-back loading in lifting two loads beside the body compared to lifting one load in front of the body.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19084840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Specific phase related patterns of trunk muscle activation during lateral lifting and lowering.
    Huang QM; Andersson EA; Thorstensson A
    Acta Physiol Scand; 2003 May; 178(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 12713514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of squat lift training and free weight muscle training on maximum lifting load and isolinetic peak torque of young adults without impairments.
    Yeung SS; Ng GY
    Phys Ther; 2000 Jun; 80(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10842410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of trunk muscle fatigue and load timing on spinal responses during sudden hand loading.
    Grondin DE; Potvin JR
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):e237-45. PubMed ID: 18617419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Underestimation of object mass in lifting does not increase the load on the low back.
    van der Burg JC; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2001 Nov; 34(11):1447-53. PubMed ID: 11672719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks.
    Abdoli-E M; Agnew MJ; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):456-65. PubMed ID: 16494978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic versus static analyses of lifting a box from the floor.
    Menzer HM; Reiser RF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():305-10. PubMed ID: 15850123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of floor slope and load carriage on standing posture.
    Reiser RF; Dalton EA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():25-30. PubMed ID: 15850077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creep and fatigue development in the low back in static flexion.
    Shin G; D'Souza C; Liu YH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(17):1873-8. PubMed ID: 19644340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Muscular contribution to low-back loading and stiffness during standard and suspended push-ups.
    Beach TA; Howarth SJ; Callaghan JP
    Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Jun; 27(3):457-72. PubMed ID: 18362038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of load knowledge on lifting technique.
    Butler D; Andersson GB; Trafimow J; Schipplein OD; Andriacchi TP
    Ergonomics; 1993 Dec; 36(12):1489-93. PubMed ID: 8287855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.