195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10755905)
21. Biotechnology: can a new technology survive?
Withers WW; Kenworthy PG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1987; 31(3):673-97. PubMed ID: 11650845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The folly of the human genome project.
Rechsteiner M
New Sci; 1990 Sep; 127(1734):20. PubMed ID: 11659262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. An evaluation of the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications program of the U.S. Human Genome Project.
Jin J
Princet J Bioeth; 2000; 3(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 11936136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. US energy agency sequences human chromosome trio.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6780):801. PubMed ID: 10786765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Who will lead human genome project?
Ebbert E
Nature; 1988 May; 333(6168):7. PubMed ID: 3362209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Homeland security. New agency contains strong science arm.
Malakoff D
Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5598):1534. PubMed ID: 12446877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Genome leaders told to keep their eyes on the main prize.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6774):111. PubMed ID: 10724133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. DOE's genome project comes of age.
Roberts L
Science; 1991 Apr; 252(5005):498-501. PubMed ID: 2020849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Science in the U.S. government: interim report.
Kennedy D
Science; 2002 May; 296(5570):981. PubMed ID: 12004088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The HGP: end of phase 1.
Nat Genet; 2002 Feb; 30(2):125. PubMed ID: 11818951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [A survey of microbial genomics projects supported by the US Department of Energy].
Ai Y
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2001 Dec; 41(6):757-61. PubMed ID: 12552837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. How human geneticists in US view commercialization of the Human Genome Project.
Rabino I
Nat Genet; 2001 Sep; 29(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 11528382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Social policy issues in genome research.
Langfelder EJ; Juengst ET
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1993; 8(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 11652658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Human genome sequencing plan wins unanimous approval in US.
Palca J
Nature; 1987 Apr 2-8; 326(6112):429. PubMed ID: 3561481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Human Cancer Genome Project moving forward despite some doubts in community.
Garber K
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Sep; 97(18):1322-4. PubMed ID: 16174849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Physicists urge technology push to reach 2005 target.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Jan; 279(5347):23. PubMed ID: 9441402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Human genome research and the responsible use of new genetic knowledge.
Juengst ET; Watson JD
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11659361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Genomics. Rat genome off to an early start.
Pennisi E
Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5483):1267-9. PubMed ID: 10979842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. US firm claims it can "sequence human genome in 3 years".
Putman L
Lancet; 1998 May; 351(9115):1566. PubMed ID: 10326553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Gifted public servants.
Geiduschek EP
Science; 1996 May; 272(5264):937-8. PubMed ID: 8638130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
