These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10756298)

  • 1. Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resin-containing, and epoxy die materials.
    Duke P; Moore BK; Haug SP; Andres CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 10756298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of few physical properties of epoxy resin, resin-modified gypsum and conventional type IV gypsum die materials: an in vitro study.
    Gujjarlapudi MC; Reddy SV; Madineni PK; Ealla KK; Nunna VN; Manne SD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 22430693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of surface hardener on gypsum abrasion resistance and water sorption.
    Lindquist TJ; Stanford CM; Knox E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 14586307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy resin die material using two setting methods.
    Paquette JM; Taniguchi T; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 10709038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy die material using different polymerization methods.
    Prisco R; Cozzolino G; Vigolo P
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 19054302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of a chemical disinfectant on the physical properties of dental stones.
    Hall BD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP; Sy J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15008235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abrasion resistance of a resin-impregnated type IV gypsum in comparison to conventional products.
    Lindquist TJ; Stanford CM; Mostafavi H; Xie XJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Mar; 87(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 11941359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of transverse strength and dimensional variations between die stone, die epoxy resin, and die polyurethane resin.
    Derrien G; Sturtz G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 8778379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alterations of surface hardness with gypsum die hardeners.
    Harris PE; Hoyer S; Lindquist TJ; Stanford CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jul; 92(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15232562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Effect of Addition of Cyanoacrylate, Epoxy Resin, and Gum Arabic on Surface Hardness of Die Stone.
    Tripathi A; Gupta A; Bagchi S; Mishra L; Gautam A; Madhok R
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 26713763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation of epoxy resin dies.
    Nomura GT; Reisbick MH; Preston JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Jul; 44(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 6929922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Properties and characteristics of a resin die material.
    Moser JB; Stone DG; Willoughby GM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Sep; 34(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 22334992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of detail reproduction for three die materials by using scanning electron microscopy and two-dimensional profilometry.
    Derrien G; Le Menn G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7674178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of four different die materials before and after disinfection of the impression: an in vitro study.
    Nandini Y; Vinitha KB; Manvi S; Smitha M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):668-74. PubMed ID: 24309347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface detail, compressive strength, and dimensional accuracy of gypsum casts after repeated immersion in hypochlorite solution.
    Abdullah MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 16765160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.
    Gerrow JD; Price RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part I: Single die.
    Chaffee NR; Bailey JH; Sherrard DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 9051599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delayed setting and hygroscopic linear expansion of three gypsum products used for cast articulation.
    Michalakis KX; Stratos A; Hirayama H; Pissiotis AL; Touloumi F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 19853173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microwave-cured acrylic resins and silicone-gypsum moulding technique.
    Del Bel Cury AA; Rached RN; Ganzarolli SM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 May; 28(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 11380783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.