162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10757600)
1. The effect of dose calculation uncertainty on the evaluation of radiotherapy plans.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Jeraj R; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 10757600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting and analyzing statistical uncertainties in Monte Carlo-based treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; Kessler ML; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK; Kong FM; McShan DL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1249-59. PubMed ID: 16798417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removing the effect of statistical uncertainty on dose-volume histograms from Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Aug; 45(8):2151-61. PubMed ID: 10958186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiotherapy dose calculations in the presence of hip prostheses.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Jeraj R; Mohan R
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 12804709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties.
Cranmer-Sargison G; Zavgorodni S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16177533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of set-up uncertainties, contour changes, and tissue inhomogeneities on target dose-volume histograms.
Cho BC; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ; Bartelink H
Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2305-18. PubMed ID: 12408305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of statistical uncertainty on inverse treatment planning based on Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Jeraj R; Keall P
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3601-13. PubMed ID: 11131187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of uncertainty-based stopping criteria for monte carlo calculations of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and arc therapy patient dose distributions.
Vanderstraeten B; Olteanu AM; Reynaert N; Leal A; De Neve W; Thierens H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):628-37. PubMed ID: 17869677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A patient-specific Monte Carlo dose-calculation method for photon beams.
Wang L; Chui CS; Lovelock M
Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):867-78. PubMed ID: 9650174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stereotactic, single-dose irradiation of lung tumors: a comparison of absolute dose and dose distribution between pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms based on actual patient CT scans.
Chen H; Lohr F; Fritz P; Wenz F; Dobler B; Lorenz F; Mühlnickel W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(3):955-63. PubMed ID: 20171796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of smoothing algorithms in Monte Carlo dose calculations of cyberknife treatment plans: a lung phantom study.
Sudahar H; Gopalakrishna Kurup PG; Murali V; Velmurugan J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2012; 8(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 23174716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accounting for center-of-mass target motion using convolution methods in Monte Carlo-based dose calculations of the lung.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Balter JM; Ten Haken RK
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):925-32. PubMed ID: 15125011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo based IMRT dose verification using MLC log files and R/V outputs.
Luo W; Li J; Price RA; Chen L; Yang J; Fan J; Chen Z; McNeeley S; Xu X; Ma CM
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2557-64. PubMed ID: 16898460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
