162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10757600)
21. Comparison of planned dose distributions calculated by Monte Carlo and Ray-Trace algorithms for the treatment of lung tumors with cyberknife: a preliminary study in 33 patients.
Wilcox EE; Daskalov GM; Lincoln H; Shumway RC; Kaplan BM; Colasanto JM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 May; 77(1):277-84. PubMed ID: 20004530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of Monte Carlo statistical uncertainties on the evaluation of dose distributions in radiation treatment planning.
Kawrakow I
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):1549-56. PubMed ID: 15152691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer.
Yang J; Li J; Chen L; Price R; McNeeley S; Qin L; Wang L; Xiong W; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):869-78. PubMed ID: 15798261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interactively exploring optimized treatment plans.
Rosen I; Liu HH; Childress N; Liao Z
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Feb; 61(2):570-82. PubMed ID: 15667980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An anatomically realistic lung model for Monte Carlo-based dose calculations.
Liang L; Larsen EW; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1013-25. PubMed ID: 17441248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Technical Note: Monte Carlo methods to comprehensively evaluate the robustness of 4D treatments in proton therapy.
Souris K; Barragan Montero A; Janssens G; Di Perri D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4676-4684. PubMed ID: 31376305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of statistical uncertainties on Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Ma CM; Li JS; Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Xiong W; Qin LH; Yang J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):891-907. PubMed ID: 15798263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.
Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tam EK; Tong AS
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5479-87. PubMed ID: 22957615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Combined PET/CT for IMRT treatment planning of NSCLC: contrast-enhanced CT images for Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Mönnich D; Lächelt S; Beyer T; Werner MK; Thorwarth D
Phys Med; 2013 Nov; 29(6):644-9. PubMed ID: 22975430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An algorithm to assess the need for clinical Monte Carlo dose calculation for small proton therapy fields based on quantification of tissue heterogeneity.
Bueno M; Paganetti H; Duch MA; Schuemann J
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081704. PubMed ID: 23927301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of varying statistical uncertainty using a Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for VMAT.
Rembish J; Myers P; Saenz D; Kirby N; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
J BUON; 2021; 26(4):1683. PubMed ID: 34565034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc oropharynx treatment planning strategies for sparing of midline structures.
Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Gagne I; Townson R; Ansbacher W; Beckham W
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4465-79. PubMed ID: 20668338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of X-ray voxel Monte Carlo versus pencil beam-based dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer under normal and deep inspiration breath hold.
Landoni V; Borzì GR; Strolin S; Bruzzaniti V; Soriani A; D'Alessio D; Ambesi F; Di Grazia AM; Strigari L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 14(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25223324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dosimetry robustness with stochastic optimization.
Nohadani O; Seco J; Martin BC; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3421-32. PubMed ID: 19436100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Recommended dose voxel size and statistical uncertainty parameters for precision of Monte Carlo dose calculation in stereotactic radiotherapy.
Goodall SK; Ebert MA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 21(12):120-130. PubMed ID: 33124741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Determination of the optimal statistical uncertainty to perform electron-beam Monte Carlo absorbed dose estimation in the target volume.
Isambert A; Brualla L; Benkebil M; Lefkopoulos D
Cancer Radiother; 2010 Apr; 14(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20061172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Libby B; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 12722809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dealing with geometric uncertainties in dose painting by numbers: introducing the ΔVH.
Witte M; Shakirin G; Houweling A; Peulen H; van Herk M
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 21937139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Application of an inverse kernel concept to Monte Carlo based IMRT.
Bogner L; Hartmann M; Rickhey M; Moravek Z
Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4749-57. PubMed ID: 17278828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Towards the elimination of Monte Carlo statistical fluctuation from dose volume histograms for radiotherapy treatment planning.
Sempau J; Bielajew AF
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jan; 45(1):131-57. PubMed ID: 10661588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
