BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10757608)

  • 1. Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo.
    Peplow DE; Verghese K
    Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 10757608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Pachoud M; Alm Carlsson G; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):432-5. PubMed ID: 15933151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):395-8. PubMed ID: 15933144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo simulation of breast imaging using synchrotron radiation.
    Fitousi NT; Delis H; Panayiotakis G
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2069-77. PubMed ID: 22482628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte-Carlo simulation of a slot-scanning digital mammography system for tomosynthesis.
    Kulkarni M; Dendere R; Nicolls F; Douglas TS
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2016; 24(2):191-206. PubMed ID: 27002901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte-Carlo simulation of a slot-scanning X-ray imaging system.
    Kulkarni M; Dendere R; Nicolls F; Steiner S; Douglas TS
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 26725256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental validation of a radiographic simulation code using breast phantom for X-ray imaging.
    Bliznakova K; Speller R; Horrocks J; Liaparinos P; Kolitsi Z; Pallikarakis N
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Feb; 40(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 20056197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo generated mammograms: development and validation.
    Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Bakas A; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3341-57. PubMed ID: 9832020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the noise variance of a digital mammography system.
    Burgess A
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1987-95. PubMed ID: 15305451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A scatter correction method for dual-energy digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ai K; Gao Y; Yu G
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):653-71. PubMed ID: 25265925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introducing DeBRa: a detailed breast model for radiological studies.
    Ma AK; Gunn S; Darambara DG
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4533-45. PubMed ID: 19556683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compact x-ray sources for mammographic applications: Monte Carlo simulations of image quality.
    Oliva P; Golosio B; Stumbo S; Bravin A; Tomassini P
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5149-61. PubMed ID: 19994525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Monte Carlo-based model for simulation of digital chest tomosynthesis.
    Ullman G; Dance DR; Sandborg M; Carlsson GA; Svalkvist A; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):159-63. PubMed ID: 20203125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics.
    Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3717-38. PubMed ID: 16077223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
    Liaparinos P; Bliznakova K
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Method for simulating dose reduction in digital mammography using the Anscombe transformation.
    Borges LR; Oliveira HCR; Nunes PF; Bakic PR; Maidment ADA; Vieira MAC
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2704-2714. PubMed ID: 27277017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of different computational models for generation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Ay MR; Sarkar S; Shahriari M; Sardari D; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1660-75. PubMed ID: 16013725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography.
    Jing Z; Huda W; Walker JK
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1111-7. PubMed ID: 9682196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.