These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10757697)

  • 1. Identification of pathological voices using glottal noise measures.
    Parsa V; Jamieson DG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 43(2):469-85. PubMed ID: 10757697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: sustained vowels versus continuous speech.
    Parsa V; Jamieson DG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):327-39. PubMed ID: 11324655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of speech production in patients with T1 glottic cancer who underwent laser cordectomy or radiotherapy.
    Hong YT; Park MJ; Hong KH
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Oct; 43(3):120-128. PubMed ID: 28975857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality.
    Eskenazi L; Childers DG; Hicks DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 2359270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of Acoustic Analysis Measurements in the Evaluation of Patients With Different Laryngeal Diagnoses.
    Lopes LW; Batista Simões L; Delfino da Silva J; da Silva Evangelista D; da Nóbrega E Ugulino AC; Oliveira Costa Silva P; Jefferson Dias Vieira V
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):382.e15-382.e26. PubMed ID: 27742492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrimination of pathological voices using a time-frequency approach.
    Umapathy K; Krishnan S; Parsa V; Jamieson DG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 15759572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer-considering signal type and smoothed cepstral peak prominence.
    Stone D; McCabe P; Palme CE; Heard R; Eastwood C; Riffat F; Madill C
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 25301299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vocal Characteristics of Elderly Women Engaged in Aerobics in Private Institutions of Salvador, Bahia.
    Colman Machado de Machado F; Cielo CA; Lessa MM; Barbosa LH
    J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):127.e9-19. PubMed ID: 25795360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children using cepstral analyses: a movement toward increased recording stability.
    Diercks GR; Ojha S; Infusino S; Maurer R; Hartnick CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 139(8):811-6. PubMed ID: 23949356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
    Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of a glottal related harmonics-to-noise ratio and spectral tilt as indicators of glottal noise in synthesized and human voice signals.
    Murphy PJ; McGuigan KG; Walsh M; Colreavy M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1642-52. PubMed ID: 18345852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of the glottal to noise excitation ratio for the screening of voice disorders.
    Godino-Llorente JI; Osma-Ruiz V; Sáenz-Lechón N; Gómez-Vilda P; Blanco-Velasco M; Cruz-Roldán F
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19135854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of residue features as correlates of voice disorders.
    Prosek RA; Montgomery AA; Walden BE; Hawkins DB
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Apr; 20(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 3584528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis and Classification of Voice Pathologies Using Glottal Signal Parameters.
    Forero M LA; Kohler M; Vellasco MM; Cataldo E
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 26474715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-evaluation in Patients With Voice Disorders.
    Lopes LW; da Silva JD; Simões LB; Evangelista DDS; Silva POC; Almeida AA; de Lima-Silva MFB
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119.e1-119.e10. PubMed ID: 27049448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual-auditory and Acoustic Analysis of Air Traffic Controllers' Voices Pre- and Postshift.
    Villar AC; Korn GP; Azevedo RR
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):768.e11-768.e15. PubMed ID: 26778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech synthesis by glottal excited linear prediction.
    Childers DG; Hu HT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2026-36. PubMed ID: 7963019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of high precision F0 extraction algorithms for sustained vowels.
    Parsa V; Jamieson DG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):112-26. PubMed ID: 10025548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of vocal severity within and across voice types.
    Wolfe VI; Steinfatt TM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Jun; 30(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 3599955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.