185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10759115)
21. Relationship between occlusal force and condylar morphology in class II and III after bi-maxillary osteotomy.
Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Tsutsui T; Hotta A; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y; Sato M; Baba N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2103-2107. PubMed ID: 30420148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of mandibular setback surgery on occlusal force.
Kim YG; Oh SH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Feb; 55(2):121-6; discussion 126-8. PubMed ID: 9024347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Number and intensity of occlusal contacts following surgical correction of mandibular prognathism.
Athanasiou AE
J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Mar; 19(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 1517876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The evaluation of jaw function subsequent to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Yang XW; Dong YJ; Long X; Zhang GZ; Kao CT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jul; 100(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 15953911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes in cross-sectional measurements of masseter, medial pterygoid muscles, ramus, condyle and occlusal force after bi-maxillary surgery.
Takayama A; Ueki K; Moroi A; Tsutsui T; Saito Y; Sato M; Yoshizawa K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 30691943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tongue-palatal contact changes in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an electropalatography study.
Kojima S; Kaku M; Yamamoto I; Yasuhara Y; Sumi H; Yamamoto T; Yashima Y; Izumino J; Nakajima K; Nagano Y; Kono M; Yoshimura A; Ueasa M; Tanimoto K
J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 44(9):673-682. PubMed ID: 28581686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of occlusal morphology on the accuracy of bite force measurements using thin film transducers.
Rottner K; Richter EJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 15543907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
Ricard D; Ferri J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of orthognathic surgery on occlusal force.
Proffit WR; Turvey TA; Fields HW; Phillips C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1989 May; 47(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 2709215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relationship between the morphologies of the masseter muscle and the ramus and occlusal force in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Ueki K; Takazakura D; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1480-6. PubMed ID: 16982305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of Treatments in Patients with Nocturnal Bruxism on Bite Force and Occlusal Contact Area: A preliminary report.
Alkan A; Bulut E; Arici S; Sato S
Eur J Dent; 2008 Oct; 2(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 19212534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Masticatory function in patients with mandibular prognathism before and after orthognathic surgery.
Kobayashi T; Honma K; Nakajima T; Hanada K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Sep; 51(9):997-1001; discussion 1002-3. PubMed ID: 8355107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Occlusal-supporting ability of individual maxillary and mandibular teeth.
Abe Y; Nogami K; Mizumachi W; Tsuka H; Hiasa K
J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 39(12):923-30. PubMed ID: 23039056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transitional joint effusion in the mandibular prognathic surgery patient: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Nishimura M; Segami N; Sato J; Honjou M; Fujimura K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 May; 62(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 15122556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Clinical evaluation of measuring system of occlusal force].
Suzuki T; Kumagai H; Yoshitomi N; Minakuchi S; Watanabe T; Uchida T; Ishinabe S; Sekita T; Kobayashi K; Kobayashi K
Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 61(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 7806939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of periodontal surgery on bite force, occlusal contact area and bite pressure.
Alkan A; Keskiner I; Arici S; Sato S
J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Jul; 137(7):978-83; quiz 1028. PubMed ID: 16803824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A study on measuring occlusal contact area using silicone impression materials: an application of this method to the bite force measurement system using the pressure-sensitive sheet.
Ando K; Kurosawa M; Fuwa Y; Kondo T; Goto S
Dent Mater J; 2007 Nov; 26(6):898-905. PubMed ID: 18203497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
