These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10761502)

  • 1. Use of likelihood ratio computation to standardize the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests.
    Montori VM; Ebbert JO
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2000 Apr; 75(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 10761502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 1. Mathematical principles.
    Weissler AM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Nov; 74(11):1061-71. PubMed ID: 10560593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 2. Clinical applications.
    Weissler AM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Nov; 74(11):1072-87. PubMed ID: 10560594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Studies about diagnostic tests: interpreting the results].
    Salech F; Mery V; Larrondo F; Rada G
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Sep; 136(9):1203-8. PubMed ID: 19030668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosing tests: using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests.
    Streiner DL
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 14638445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating Prognostic Markers Using Relative Utility Curves and Test Tradeoffs.
    Baker SG; Kramer BS
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(23):2578-80. PubMed ID: 26124476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should the definition for the negative likelihood ratio be changed?
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Almaraz A; Fariñas-Alvarez C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Jun; 50(6):641-2; discussion 643-4. PubMed ID: 9250262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating validity of screening tests.
    Larson E
    Nurs Res; 1986; 35(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 3635057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
    Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
    Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrocardiograms in athletes: interpretation and diagnostic accuracy.
    Lawless CE; Best TM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 May; 40(5):787-98. PubMed ID: 18408622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results.
    Radack KL; Rouan G; Hedges J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Aug; 110(8):689-93. PubMed ID: 3755325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of diagnostic tests.
    Gjørup T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 166():9-14. PubMed ID: 9253371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
    Johnson NP
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On testing independence of repeated screening tests.
    Xu JL; Prorok PC
    J Med Screen; 2009; 16(1):50; author reply 51. PubMed ID: 19349533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critique on contemporary reporting of likelihood ratios in test power analysis.
    Weissler AM; Bailey KR
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2004 Oct; 79(10):1317-8. PubMed ID: 15473417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proteomics and cancer: running before we can walk?
    Check E
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):496-7. PubMed ID: 15175721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tools for critical appraisal of evidence in studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Giavarina D
    Autoimmun Rev; 2012 Dec; 12(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 22781590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Diagnostic likelihood ratios].
    Capron L
    Rev Prat; 2000 Nov; 50(17):1865-9. PubMed ID: 11151325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Performance evaluation (validation) of diagnosis].
    Röding H; Schenke K
    Zentralbl Chir; 1987; 112(16):1001-10. PubMed ID: 3673309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.