These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10761502)

  • 21. [Systematic reviews in practice. X. Searching, selecting and the methodological assessment of diagnostic evaluation research].
    Devillé WL; Bossuyt PM; de Vet HC; Bezemer PD; Bouter LM; Assendelft WJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(48):2281-4. PubMed ID: 12497754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cardiovascular risk assessment in hypertensive patients with tests recommended by the European Guidelines on Hypertension.
    Gómez-Marcos MA; González-Elena LJ; Recio-Rodríguez JI; Rodríguez-Sánchez E; Magallón-Botaya R; Muñoz-Moreno MF; Patino-Alonso MC; García-Ortiz L
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 19(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 21450575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prognostic value of routine preoperative electrocardiography in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.
    Noordzij PG; Boersma E; Bax JJ; Feringa HH; Schreiner F; Schouten O; Kertai MD; Klein J; van Urk H; Elhendy A; Poldermans D
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Apr; 97(7):1103-6. PubMed ID: 16563926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gene expression profile assays as predictors of recurrence-free survival in early-stage breast cancer: a metaanalysis.
    Lyman GH; Kuderer NM
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2006 Dec; 7(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 17239261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Number needed to misdiagnose: a measure of diagnostic test effectiveness.
    Habibzadeh F; Yadollahie M
    Epidemiology; 2013 Jan; 24(1):170. PubMed ID: 23232619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Graphic representation of numerically calculated predictive values: an easily comprehended method of evaluating diagnostic tests.
    Daniel BL; Daniel TM
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 8246708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Re: Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Formann AK; Böhning D
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):777-8. PubMed ID: 18718923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing Diagnostic Tests I: You Can't Be Too Sensitive.
    Jupiter DC
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(3):519-20. PubMed ID: 25797083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
    Drobatz KJ
    J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preoperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery.
    Maddox TM
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2005 May; 72(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 15915313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rethinking the prescription of biotin for dermatologic conditions.
    Kumar A; Lotti T; França K
    Dermatol Ther; 2018 Jul; 31(4):e12618. PubMed ID: 29786929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computers in paediatrics. 18. Medical decision making: computer program to calculate sensitivity, specificity, false positive and negative rates, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of a diagnostic test.
    Yip WC; Tay JS; Ho TF; Wong HB
    J Singapore Paediatr Soc; 1986; 28(1-2):74-8. PubMed ID: 3531721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests].
    Smets P
    Rev Med Brux; 1985 Sep; 6(7):451-4. PubMed ID: 4081407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine practice guidelines: Clinical utilization of cardiac biomarker testing in heart failure.
    Tang WH; Francis GS; Morrow DA; Newby LK; Cannon CP; Jesse RL; Storrow AB; Christenson RH; Apple FS; Ravkilde J; Wu AH;
    Circulation; 2007 Jul; 116(5):e99-109. PubMed ID: 17630410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Applying results from studies on diagnostic tests].
    Rivera M S; Letelier S LM
    Rev Med Chil; 2011 May; 139(5):672-5. PubMed ID: 22051721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Urine analysis: current performance and strategies for improvement.
    Fraser CG
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Aug; 291(6491):321-3. PubMed ID: 3926181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The value of laboratory investigations of elderly psychiatric patients.
    Kolman PB
    J Clin Psychiatry; 1984 Mar; 45(3):112-6. PubMed ID: 6698942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction and stratification of the future cardiovascular arrhythmic events: signal averaged electrocardiography versus ejection fraction.
    Pandey AK; Das A; Singwala AK; Bhatt KN
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2010; 54(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21090529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Routine laboratory testing for medical disorders in psychiatric inpatients.
    Dolan JG; Mushlin AI
    Arch Intern Med; 1985 Nov; 145(11):2085-8. PubMed ID: 4062463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.