These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10762182)
1. Evaluation of the use of Urocath-Gel catheters for intermittent self-catheterization by male patients using conventional catheters for a long time. Wyndaele J; De Ridder D; Everaert K; Heilporn A; Congard-Chassol B Spinal Cord; 2000 Feb; 38(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 10762182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: long-term followup of a hydrophilic low friction technique. Waller L; Jonsson O; Norlén L; Sullivan L J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 7815579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study. Sarica S; Akkoc Y; Karapolat H; Aktug H Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Dec; 46(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20445490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydrophilic catheters: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(9):1-31. PubMed ID: 23074500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Long-term usefulness and safety of the contemporary balloon catheter]. Ozawa H; Uematsu K; Ohmori H; Kondo A; Iwatsubo E; Takasaka S Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 96(5):541-7. PubMed ID: 16083031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complications and patient satisfaction with urethral clean intermittent catheterization in spina bifida patients: comparing coated vs uncoated catheters. Burki T; Abasher A; Alshahrani A; Al Hams AW; Ibrahim H; Albadawe H; Al Modhen F; Jamalalail Y; Al Shammari A J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):646-650. PubMed ID: 31699601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, randomized, crossover, multicenter study comparing quality of life using compact versus standard catheters for intermittent self-catheterization. Chartier-Kastler E; Amarenco G; Lindbo L; Soljanik I; Andersen HL; Bagi P; Gjødsbøl K; Domurath B J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):942-7. PubMed ID: 23587630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Results of a prospective randomized control trial comparing hydrophilic to uncoated catheters in children with neurogenic bladder. DeFoor W; Reddy P; Reed M; VanderBrink B; Jackson E; Zhang B; Denlinger J; Noh P; Minevich E; Sheldon C J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Aug; 13(4):373.e1-373.e5. PubMed ID: 28713004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications of clean intermittent catheterization in boys and young males with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Lindehall B; Abrahamsson K; Hjälmås K; Jodal U; Olsson I; Sillén U J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 2):1686-8. PubMed ID: 15371790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial. De Ridder DJ; Everaert K; Fernández LG; Valero JV; Durán AB; Abrisqueta ML; Ventura MG; Sotillo AR Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):991-5. PubMed ID: 16137822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. Bermingham SL; Hodgkinson S; Wright S; Hayter E; Spinks J; Pellowe C BMJ; 2013 Jan; 346():e8639. PubMed ID: 23303886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. Vapnek JM; Maynard FM; Kim J J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):994-8. PubMed ID: 12576829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters. Stensballe J; Looms D; Nielsen PN; Tvede M Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):978-83. PubMed ID: 16126331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophilic catheters as a treatment of chronic neurogenic urinary retention. Chartier-Kastler E; Denys P Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Jan; 30(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 20928913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection. Kiddoo D; Sawatzky B; Bascu CD; Dharamsi N; Afshar K; Moore KN J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 25584995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the InCaSaQ, a new tool for the evaluation of patient satisfaction with clean intermittent self-catheterization. Guinet-Lacoste A; Jousse M; Verollet D; Sheikh Ismael S; Le Breton F; Tan E; Amarenco G Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Apr; 57(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 24680634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intermittent catheterization difficulty questionnaire (ICDQ): A new tool for the evaluation of patient difficulties with clean intermittent self-catheterization. Guinet-Lacoste A; Jousse M; Tan E; Caillebot M; Le Breton F; Amarenco G Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Jan; 35(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 25327888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]