These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10762683)

  • 1. A new method to quantify wear using implant supported restorations.
    Wiskott HW; Perriard J; Scherrer SS; Belser UC
    Dent Mater; 2000 May; 16(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 10762683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo wear of three types of veneering materials using implant-supported restorations: a method evaluation.
    Anselm Wiskott HW; Perriard J; Scherrer SS; Dieth S; Belser UC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Feb; 110(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 11883422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using implant connectors to support clinical abrasion probes: a methodological study.
    Wiskott HW; Perriard J; Scherrer SS; Bois N; Belser UC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Oct; 23(10):1289-95. PubMed ID: 17239945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
    Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An accurate and simple method for the measurement of dental composite wear.
    Winkler MM; Lautenschlager EP; Boghosian A; Greener EH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Jul; 23(7):486-93. PubMed ID: 8814565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.
    Obermeier M; Ristow O; Erdelt K; Beuer F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):981-991. PubMed ID: 28710653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional image correlation analyses for strains generated by cement and screw-retained implant prostheses.
    Clelland NL; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 22171595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns.
    de Kok P; Kleverlaan CJ; de Jager N; Kuijs R; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25819357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up.
    Mangano F; Macchi A; Caprioglio A; Sammons RL; Piattelli A; Mangano C
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 24750435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns.
    Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Gueth JF; Edelhoff D; Naumann M
    Dent Mater; 2012 Apr; 28(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 22196898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
    Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-vitro performance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported temporary crowns.
    Rosentritt M; Raab P; Hahnel S; Stöckle M; Preis V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2581-2587. PubMed ID: 28110407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical risk factors related to failures with zirconia-based restorations: an up to 9-year retrospective study.
    Koenig V; Vanheusden AJ; Le Goff SO; Mainjot AK
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1164-74. PubMed ID: 24135294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fabricating custom provisional restorations for the ITI solid abutment system.
    Schneider RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):105-7. PubMed ID: 12239487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the correlation of photoelasticity and digital imaging to characterize the load transfer of implant-supported restorations.
    Tiossi R; de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; Conrad HJ; de Mattos Mda G; Fok AS; Ribeiro RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 24461947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A new method for 3-dimensional wear measurement].
    Krejci I; Reich T; Bucher W; Lutz F
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 8134815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.
    Klotz MW; Taylor TD; Goldberg AJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):970-5. PubMed ID: 22010078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.