These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10763294)

  • 1. Development of speechreading supplements based on automatic speech recognition.
    Duchnowski P; Lum DS; Krause JC; Sexton MG; Bratakos MS; Braida LD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Apr; 47(4):487-96. PubMed ID: 10763294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic speech recognition to aid the hearing impaired: prospects for the automatic generation of cued speech.
    Uchanski RM; Delhorne LA; Dix AK; Braida LD; Reed CM; Durlach NI
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1994; 31(1):20-41. PubMed ID: 8035358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cued speech, manual complement to lipreading, for visual reception of spoken language. Principles, practice and prospects for automation.
    Cornett RO
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988; 42(3):375-84. PubMed ID: 3213492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
    Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seeing speech and seeing sign: insights from a fMRI study.
    Campbell R; Capek C
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S3-9. PubMed ID: 19012106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye fixations of deaf and hearing observers in simultaneous communication perception.
    De Filippo CL; Lansing CR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16825884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cued Speech and the reception of spoken language.
    Nicholls GH; Ling D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 7120965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of handedness in tactile speech perception.
    Sarant JZ; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(4):423-35. PubMed ID: 8158558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early experience of Cued Speech enhances speechreading performance in deaf.
    Aparicio M; Peigneux P; Charlier B; Neyrat C; Leybaert J
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 21995589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Text generation from Taiwanese Sign Language using a PST-based language model for augmentative communication.
    Wu CH; Chiu YH; Guo CS
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2004 Dec; 12(4):441-54. PubMed ID: 15615000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What can be expected from a late cochlear implantation?
    Kos MI; Deriaz M; Guyot JP; Pelizzone M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 73(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 19054582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intelligibility of speech produced during simultaneous communication.
    Whitehead RL; Schiavetti N; MacKenzie DJ; Metz DE
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 15063145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The rhyming skills of deaf children educated with phonetically augmented speechreading.
    Charlier BL; Leybaert J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):349-75. PubMed ID: 10881610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual phonemic ambiguity and speechreading.
    Lidestam B; Beskow J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):835-47. PubMed ID: 16908878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling the temporal dynamics of distinctive feature landmark detectors for speech recognition.
    Jansen A; Niyogi P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1739-58. PubMed ID: 19045664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic speech recognition and training for severely dysarthric users of assistive technology: the STARDUST project.
    Parker M; Cunningham S; Enderby P; Hawley M; Green P
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):149-56. PubMed ID: 16428231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five.
    Tobey EA; Geers AE; Brenner C; Altuna D; Gabbert G
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):36S-45S. PubMed ID: 12612479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.