209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10764098)
1. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.
Reder LM; Nhouyvanisvong A; Schunn CD; Ayers MS; Angstadt P; Hiraki K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):294-320. PubMed ID: 10764098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On interpreting the relationship between remember-know judgments and confidence: the role of instructions.
Geraci L; McCabe DP; Guillory JJ
Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 19477141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Context effects on remembering and knowing: the expectancy heuristic.
McCabe DP; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):536-49. PubMed ID: 17470004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of word frequency and similarity on recognition judgments: the role of recollection.
Park H; Reder LM; Dickison D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):568-78. PubMed ID: 15910138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of extralist associations in false remembering: a source misattribution account.
McCabe DP; Geraci L
Mem Cognit; 2009 Mar; 37(2):130-42. PubMed ID: 19223563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments.
Inoue C; Bellezza FS
Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 9584437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the multimemory and detection theories of know and remember recognition judgments.
Xu M; Bellezza FS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1197-210. PubMed ID: 11550748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.
Reder LM; Angstadt P; Cary M; Erickson MA; Ayers MS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):138-52. PubMed ID: 11827076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of RT distributions in the remember-know paradigm.
Rotello CM; Zeng M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 18792511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory.
Hoshino Y
Mem Cognit; 1991 Nov; 19(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 1758305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency.
Malmberg KJ; Holden JE; Shiffren RM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):319-31. PubMed ID: 14979807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.
Diana RA; Reder LM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):805-15. PubMed ID: 16822148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember-know judgments.
McCabe DP; Geraci LD
Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 19344688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Different definitions of the nonrecollection-based response option(s) change how people use the "remember" response in the remember/know paradigm.
Williams HL; Lindsay DS
Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1359-1374. PubMed ID: 31119498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the generality of the revelation effect.
Westerman DL; Greene RL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1147-53. PubMed ID: 8805819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Memorability judgments for high- and low-frequency words.
Guttentag R; Carroll D
Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):951-8. PubMed ID: 9796228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recognition memory and awareness: A high-frequency advantage in the accuracy of knowing.
Gregg VH; Gardiner JM; Karayianni I; Konstantinou I
Memory; 2006 Apr; 14(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 16574583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past.
Rajaram S
Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 8433652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.
Kinoshita S
Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):569-80. PubMed ID: 7476243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. List composition and the word-frequency effect for recognition memory.
Malmberg KJ; Murnane K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):616-30. PubMed ID: 12109757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]