BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10764098)

  • 1. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.
    Reder LM; Nhouyvanisvong A; Schunn CD; Ayers MS; Angstadt P; Hiraki K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):294-320. PubMed ID: 10764098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On interpreting the relationship between remember-know judgments and confidence: the role of instructions.
    Geraci L; McCabe DP; Guillory JJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 19477141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context effects on remembering and knowing: the expectancy heuristic.
    McCabe DP; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):536-49. PubMed ID: 17470004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of word frequency and similarity on recognition judgments: the role of recollection.
    Park H; Reder LM; Dickison D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):568-78. PubMed ID: 15910138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of extralist associations in false remembering: a source misattribution account.
    McCabe DP; Geraci L
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Mar; 37(2):130-42. PubMed ID: 19223563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments.
    Inoue C; Bellezza FS
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 9584437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the multimemory and detection theories of know and remember recognition judgments.
    Xu M; Bellezza FS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1197-210. PubMed ID: 11550748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.
    Reder LM; Angstadt P; Cary M; Erickson MA; Ayers MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):138-52. PubMed ID: 11827076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of RT distributions in the remember-know paradigm.
    Rotello CM; Zeng M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 18792511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory.
    Hoshino Y
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Nov; 19(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 1758305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency.
    Malmberg KJ; Holden JE; Shiffren RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):319-31. PubMed ID: 14979807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.
    Diana RA; Reder LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):805-15. PubMed ID: 16822148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember-know judgments.
    McCabe DP; Geraci LD
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 19344688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different definitions of the nonrecollection-based response option(s) change how people use the "remember" response in the remember/know paradigm.
    Williams HL; Lindsay DS
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1359-1374. PubMed ID: 31119498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the generality of the revelation effect.
    Westerman DL; Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1147-53. PubMed ID: 8805819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memorability judgments for high- and low-frequency words.
    Guttentag R; Carroll D
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):951-8. PubMed ID: 9796228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition memory and awareness: A high-frequency advantage in the accuracy of knowing.
    Gregg VH; Gardiner JM; Karayianni I; Konstantinou I
    Memory; 2006 Apr; 14(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 16574583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past.
    Rajaram S
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 8433652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):569-80. PubMed ID: 7476243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. List composition and the word-frequency effect for recognition memory.
    Malmberg KJ; Murnane K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):616-30. PubMed ID: 12109757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.